<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Get Emails.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/25/we-get-emails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/25/we-get-emails/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:12:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: courage</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/25/we-get-emails/#comment-213800</link>
		<dc:creator>courage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 04:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9879#comment-213800</guid>
		<description>Tim nails the issue.  Most women don&#039;t feel comfortable in the primary breadwinner role and equally true most men don&#039;t feel comfortable in the primary caregiver role.  There are a plethora of articles dealing with this recent phenomena of women in the primary breadwinning role wherein women express dissatisfaction with the role that they find themselves in.  I link to one such articale here

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/CollegeAndFamily/LoveAndMoney/SecretLivesOfBreadwinnerWives.aspx

Vincent&#039;s wife found herself in that role and decided she didn&#039;t like it and dumped him after he had made sacrifices for her.  Vincent, in many respects, was the wife here and I guess what many of you feminists are saying is no man should ever be a wife, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim nails the issue.  Most women don&#8217;t feel comfortable in the primary breadwinner role and equally true most men don&#8217;t feel comfortable in the primary caregiver role.  There are a plethora of articles dealing with this recent phenomena of women in the primary breadwinning role wherein women express dissatisfaction with the role that they find themselves in.  I link to one such articale here</p>
<p><a href="http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/CollegeAndFamily/LoveAndMoney/SecretLivesOfBreadwinnerWives.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/CollegeAndFamily/LoveAndMoney/SecretLivesOfBreadwinnerWives.aspx</a></p>
<p>Vincent&#8217;s wife found herself in that role and decided she didn&#8217;t like it and dumped him after he had made sacrifices for her.  Vincent, in many respects, was the wife here and I guess what many of you feminists are saying is no man should ever be a wife, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: courage</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/25/we-get-emails/#comment-213767</link>
		<dc:creator>courage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 04:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9879#comment-213767</guid>
		<description>Oh, yeah and legally speaking child support isn&#039;t for him its for the kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, yeah and legally speaking child support isn&#8217;t for him its for the kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: courage</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/25/we-get-emails/#comment-213765</link>
		<dc:creator>courage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 04:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9879#comment-213765</guid>
		<description>I know this person and all of you who said he is getting alimony are wrong, though I note he says he&#039;s getting alimony he misunderstood.  He is getting 60% of the marital assets in lieu of alimony and he will be seeing his kids 187 days fewer per year than he did before.  If you read his posts from August 23, 2006 and obviously, few of you did, he made substantial sacrifices to accommodate his wife&#039;s career ambitions.  Any wife who made similiar career sacrifices would have ended up with primary physical custody and helluva alot more.  He has been for most of his children&#039;s lives the primary caregiver to his children and the reason why he is on anti-anxiety medication and anti-depressants is because he will be seeing alot less of his kids while he trys to resurrect a carreer while in his 50&#039;s.  Also, after making the sacrifices for his wife&#039;s career that he did, his wife had an affair.  So all you people who have castigated this good man should be ashemed!  I don&#039;t anticipate that this post will see the light of day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this person and all of you who said he is getting alimony are wrong, though I note he says he&#8217;s getting alimony he misunderstood.  He is getting 60% of the marital assets in lieu of alimony and he will be seeing his kids 187 days fewer per year than he did before.  If you read his posts from August 23, 2006 and obviously, few of you did, he made substantial sacrifices to accommodate his wife&#8217;s career ambitions.  Any wife who made similiar career sacrifices would have ended up with primary physical custody and helluva alot more.  He has been for most of his children&#8217;s lives the primary caregiver to his children and the reason why he is on anti-anxiety medication and anti-depressants is because he will be seeing alot less of his kids while he trys to resurrect a carreer while in his 50&#8242;s.  Also, after making the sacrifices for his wife&#8217;s career that he did, his wife had an affair.  So all you people who have castigated this good man should be ashemed!  I don&#8217;t anticipate that this post will see the light of day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/25/we-get-emails/#comment-213719</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9879#comment-213719</guid>
		<description>Hi Unree - The evidence is anectodal, but you are probably aware of the many different variants of magazines like Bride. Very colorful, very glossy, and very appealing. Now, how many issues of &quot;Groom&quot; have you seen lately? How many men go about dreaming about &quot;the big day?&quot;. The simple fact is that we just don&#039;t.

I don&#039;t know if anyone ever researched it empirically. I don&#039;t know if any university or government body would fund such research. But if they did, I would expect that at least 70% of marriages have happened because the woman in the courtship eventually demanded it.

This is not a slander on women. As one of the above female posters pointed out, there is a lot of social/religious brainwashing and pressure on young girls that they must get married at all costs, and that they will be ruined/wasted nobodies if they don&#039;t succeed. Many women get cheated out of their most fun, beautiful, young, and carefree years because they went with the program and pulled the trigger too early. Then one day, many years later,  they wake up next to men they don&#039;t find attractive (and perhaps never found attractive at a true chemical level) and say what have I done?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Unree &#8211; The evidence is anectodal, but you are probably aware of the many different variants of magazines like Bride. Very colorful, very glossy, and very appealing. Now, how many issues of &#8220;Groom&#8221; have you seen lately? How many men go about dreaming about &#8220;the big day?&#8221;. The simple fact is that we just don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if anyone ever researched it empirically. I don&#8217;t know if any university or government body would fund such research. But if they did, I would expect that at least 70% of marriages have happened because the woman in the courtship eventually demanded it.</p>
<p>This is not a slander on women. As one of the above female posters pointed out, there is a lot of social/religious brainwashing and pressure on young girls that they must get married at all costs, and that they will be ruined/wasted nobodies if they don&#8217;t succeed. Many women get cheated out of their most fun, beautiful, young, and carefree years because they went with the program and pulled the trigger too early. Then one day, many years later,  they wake up next to men they don&#8217;t find attractive (and perhaps never found attractive at a true chemical level) and say what have I done?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unree</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/25/we-get-emails/#comment-213704</link>
		<dc:creator>Unree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9879#comment-213704</guid>
		<description>I think the thread is probably dead (got here late) but David, if you are still here, could you clarify

&lt;blockquote&gt;Ok if we are going to draw gender lines here, can anyone explain to me why 70% of all divorces (US) are initiated by women? Against the backdrop of a majority of marriages also demanded by women, isn’t this a little absurd?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The part about initiating divorce is well documented, but how do you know that women &quot;demand the majority of marriages&quot;?  I&#039;ve never seen any stas on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the thread is probably dead (got here late) but David, if you are still here, could you clarify</p>
<blockquote><p>Ok if we are going to draw gender lines here, can anyone explain to me why 70% of all divorces (US) are initiated by women? Against the backdrop of a majority of marriages also demanded by women, isn’t this a little absurd?</p></blockquote>
<p>The part about initiating divorce is well documented, but how do you know that women &#8220;demand the majority of marriages&#8221;?  I&#8217;ve never seen any stas on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/25/we-get-emails/#comment-213319</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9879#comment-213319</guid>
		<description>less13lee - I am in a similar arrangement as you with my awesome girlfriend with whom I live together. She has also taken the path you describe and we are the happier for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>less13lee &#8211; I am in a similar arrangement as you with my awesome girlfriend with whom I live together. She has also taken the path you describe and we are the happier for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: less13lee</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/25/we-get-emails/#comment-213255</link>
		<dc:creator>less13lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9879#comment-213255</guid>
		<description>you know, i think it&#039;s clear why more women initiate divorce- as the poster stated above, societal pressure for women to marry is huge. therefore, a lot of women marry before they are ready and subsequently realize that marriage isn&#039;t as awesome as they were expecting. 

as a personal aside, i am the first person in my entire extended family to have a college degree, i went above and beyond that and got a master&#039;s, i have a rewarding career, i support myself and live in a large, exciting city. i also have a live-in boyfriend who is awesome. we have decided not to get married and instead, we are focussing on maintaining a good, long-term relationship. i like my life quite a bit. 

to my family in alabama i am a failure and a spinster. i have my priorities wrong and i will end up miserable and alone because i didn&#039;t get pregnant with the first man who showed any interest in me and i chose an education over child-rearing.

if i had listened to their &quot;advice&quot; i would have married my high school sweetheart, birthed a few kids, eschewed college and been divorced and a quite possibly a single parent by now. sounds miserable to me, but if i had followed this script, i would have been doing the &quot;right&quot; thing by them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know, i think it&#8217;s clear why more women initiate divorce- as the poster stated above, societal pressure for women to marry is huge. therefore, a lot of women marry before they are ready and subsequently realize that marriage isn&#8217;t as awesome as they were expecting. </p>
<p>as a personal aside, i am the first person in my entire extended family to have a college degree, i went above and beyond that and got a master&#8217;s, i have a rewarding career, i support myself and live in a large, exciting city. i also have a live-in boyfriend who is awesome. we have decided not to get married and instead, we are focussing on maintaining a good, long-term relationship. i like my life quite a bit. </p>
<p>to my family in alabama i am a failure and a spinster. i have my priorities wrong and i will end up miserable and alone because i didn&#8217;t get pregnant with the first man who showed any interest in me and i chose an education over child-rearing.</p>
<p>if i had listened to their &#8220;advice&#8221; i would have married my high school sweetheart, birthed a few kids, eschewed college and been divorced and a quite possibly a single parent by now. sounds miserable to me, but if i had followed this script, i would have been doing the &#8220;right&#8221; thing by them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/25/we-get-emails/#comment-213212</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 04:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9879#comment-213212</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think you are racist and sexist 10G, but it should not stop you from open discussion with someone you disagree with at this site.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Calm down, man.   I can&#039;t say for sure, because I&#039;m not privy to the intent of the proprietors of this website.  I just come here because there are some excellent writers, and there&#039;s some news I probably wouldn&#039;t find anywhere else.   But, if you want to debate the merits of the stay-at-home domestic wife, the evils of taxpayer-funded rape kits, or the sanctity of the life of a blastocyst, there&#039;s about a billion forums on the interwebs where you can do that.   I get the impression that sometimes women want to have a space they can discuss issues that are important to them, without the traditional input from concern trolls or rightwing reactionaries.   I&#039;m sure in their everyday lives, and in about 99% of cyberspace, they have to deal with the traditional shouting matches and reactionary views of billions of goons and wingnuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think you are racist and sexist 10G, but it should not stop you from open discussion with someone you disagree with at this site.</p></blockquote>
<p>Calm down, man.   I can&#8217;t say for sure, because I&#8217;m not privy to the intent of the proprietors of this website.  I just come here because there are some excellent writers, and there&#8217;s some news I probably wouldn&#8217;t find anywhere else.   But, if you want to debate the merits of the stay-at-home domestic wife, the evils of taxpayer-funded rape kits, or the sanctity of the life of a blastocyst, there&#8217;s about a billion forums on the interwebs where you can do that.   I get the impression that sometimes women want to have a space they can discuss issues that are important to them, without the traditional input from concern trolls or rightwing reactionaries.   I&#8217;m sure in their everyday lives, and in about 99% of cyberspace, they have to deal with the traditional shouting matches and reactionary views of billions of goons and wingnuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bene</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/25/we-get-emails/#comment-213211</link>
		<dc:creator>Bene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 04:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9879#comment-213211</guid>
		<description>Tim @ 79: If you&#039;re really here for discussion, way to miss the whole point that bushfire made--address the fact that if you cut the deflection out of your statement, it boils down to &#039;gee, women getting power is bad&#039; or at best another verse of &#039;but what about the menz&#039;.

Or is that not what you were saying behind all of that superfluous crap?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim @ 79: If you&#8217;re really here for discussion, way to miss the whole point that bushfire made&#8211;address the fact that if you cut the deflection out of your statement, it boils down to &#8216;gee, women getting power is bad&#8217; or at best another verse of &#8216;but what about the menz&#8217;.</p>
<p>Or is that not what you were saying behind all of that superfluous crap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: panqueque</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/11/25/we-get-emails/#comment-213206</link>
		<dc:creator>panqueque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=9879#comment-213206</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It’s a different world and I don’t think any of us can really say what the effects of women being in careers is having on families. There will be both good and bad things, and we should all try to find ways of diminishing the bad things (such as the stresses kids will feel and the anger the parting married people may feel from the situation.)&lt;/i&gt;

Tim, the thing is, you&#039;re claiming here that the anger of men (like Vincent) is an &quot;effect&quot; of women having careers. That&#039;s certainly what Vincent claims as well. This is sexist because it seems to assume that the cause of the anger isn&#039;t patriarchal ideas about what women and men should do/think/earn, but women&#039;s choices themselves. Now, a lot of people hold those patriarchal ideas, so in that sense, yeah, there&#039;s going to be a link between women having careers and some men&#039;s anger. But to say that women&#039;s autonomy is the direct cause of marital problems--without acknowledging that it&#039;s bullshit patriarchal ideology that&#039;s really the problem--is just wrong. For starters, many, MANY men seem to be able to deal with their female partners having money and power--and not through magic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It’s a different world and I don’t think any of us can really say what the effects of women being in careers is having on families. There will be both good and bad things, and we should all try to find ways of diminishing the bad things (such as the stresses kids will feel and the anger the parting married people may feel from the situation.)</i></p>
<p>Tim, the thing is, you&#8217;re claiming here that the anger of men (like Vincent) is an &#8220;effect&#8221; of women having careers. That&#8217;s certainly what Vincent claims as well. This is sexist because it seems to assume that the cause of the anger isn&#8217;t patriarchal ideas about what women and men should do/think/earn, but women&#8217;s choices themselves. Now, a lot of people hold those patriarchal ideas, so in that sense, yeah, there&#8217;s going to be a link between women having careers and some men&#8217;s anger. But to say that women&#8217;s autonomy is the direct cause of marital problems&#8211;without acknowledging that it&#8217;s bullshit patriarchal ideology that&#8217;s really the problem&#8211;is just wrong. For starters, many, MANY men seem to be able to deal with their female partners having money and power&#8211;and not through magic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.030 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 03:23:35 -->
