<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ladies, let&#8217;s get the painful part over first!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/12/18/ladies-lets-get-the-painful-part-over-first/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/12/18/ladies-lets-get-the-painful-part-over-first/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:50:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheelzebub</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/12/18/ladies-lets-get-the-painful-part-over-first/#comment-218063</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheelzebub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 04:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10253#comment-218063</guid>
		<description>&quot;I believe I specifically stated that. They aren’t good people. Not even a little. Of course they aren’t sweating it. They don’t care about other people. Should we join their philosophy that only some people are “worthy”?&quot;

This isn&#039;t about who&#039;s &quot;worthy,&quot; for Hade&#039;s sake (though people like me have been treated as unworthy by both parties for years now), and frankly, it&#039;s not about the wounded and bruised fee-fee&#039;s of bigots.  We&#039;ve been giving these folks plenty of credibility, space to speak their minds, and sympathy since at least Bill Clinton was in office, and it&#039;s not as if they have come to the conclusion that us bitches or queers are human beings.  These folks have had the mike (as Piny put it) for years now, and it&#039;s only served to legitimize their bigotry and embolden them.  

You want to engage folks like Warren at roundtables and public debates and the like?  Hey, have at it.  But engagement does NOT mean we give them (yet *again*) a platform to further bolster their credibility.  Even if Obama yells from the rooftops that he does not agree with Warren, he will legitimize Warren&#039;s vile and hateful views by giving him this platform and this place of honor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I believe I specifically stated that. They aren’t good people. Not even a little. Of course they aren’t sweating it. They don’t care about other people. Should we join their philosophy that only some people are “worthy”?&#8221;</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t about who&#8217;s &#8220;worthy,&#8221; for Hade&#8217;s sake (though people like me have been treated as unworthy by both parties for years now), and frankly, it&#8217;s not about the wounded and bruised fee-fee&#8217;s of bigots.  We&#8217;ve been giving these folks plenty of credibility, space to speak their minds, and sympathy since at least Bill Clinton was in office, and it&#8217;s not as if they have come to the conclusion that us bitches or queers are human beings.  These folks have had the mike (as Piny put it) for years now, and it&#8217;s only served to legitimize their bigotry and embolden them.  </p>
<p>You want to engage folks like Warren at roundtables and public debates and the like?  Hey, have at it.  But engagement does NOT mean we give them (yet *again*) a platform to further bolster their credibility.  Even if Obama yells from the rooftops that he does not agree with Warren, he will legitimize Warren&#8217;s vile and hateful views by giving him this platform and this place of honor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: piny</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/12/18/ladies-lets-get-the-painful-part-over-first/#comment-218056</link>
		<dc:creator>piny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10253#comment-218056</guid>
		<description>What Mireille said.  This isn&#039;t reaching across the aisle.  This is handing them the mike.  That man may be moderate if you narrow the field to the truly reactionary, but he is not moderate in terms of American religious belief or American beliefs about social-conservative flashpoints.  Wifely submission does not have mainstream consensus here; neither does the belief that a gay relationship should be legally indistinct from bestiality.  

We can certainly agree to disagree, but  I&#039;ve got the election results on my side.  I don&#039;t know if you remember, but we have had both Huckabee and Palin candidacies.  Huckabee lost the primary to the man who pretended he was a moderate conservative.  That man proceeded to attach himself to Palin, and she helped cost him the election.  The man who defeated him by running as a moderate liberal just shocked the nation by asking a reactionary to bless his office.  Warren does not represent the ascendant political power players in this country.  Playing to that &quot;base&quot; was a stupid, self-defeating strategy for the party of racist misogynist troglodytes; their nemeses will get absolutely nowhere in service to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Mireille said.  This isn&#8217;t reaching across the aisle.  This is handing them the mike.  That man may be moderate if you narrow the field to the truly reactionary, but he is not moderate in terms of American religious belief or American beliefs about social-conservative flashpoints.  Wifely submission does not have mainstream consensus here; neither does the belief that a gay relationship should be legally indistinct from bestiality.  </p>
<p>We can certainly agree to disagree, but  I&#8217;ve got the election results on my side.  I don&#8217;t know if you remember, but we have had both Huckabee and Palin candidacies.  Huckabee lost the primary to the man who pretended he was a moderate conservative.  That man proceeded to attach himself to Palin, and she helped cost him the election.  The man who defeated him by running as a moderate liberal just shocked the nation by asking a reactionary to bless his office.  Warren does not represent the ascendant political power players in this country.  Playing to that &#8220;base&#8221; was a stupid, self-defeating strategy for the party of racist misogynist troglodytes; their nemeses will get absolutely nowhere in service to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: octogalore</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/12/18/ladies-lets-get-the-painful-part-over-first/#comment-217949</link>
		<dc:creator>octogalore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10253#comment-217949</guid>
		<description>Salon state that Dianne Feinstein&#039;s team confirms that Warren was Obama&#039;s pick (http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/12/19/rick_warren/?source=newsletter):

&quot;&#039;That was solely the choice of the president-elect,&#039; said Gil Duran, a spokesman for Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the California Democrat who chairs the congressional committee. Obama&#039;s staff sent explicit orders for whom to include in the inaugural ceremony up to Capitol Hill, since Congress is, technically, in charge of that part of the day. &#039;Sen. Feinstein obviously disagrees with the views of Rev. Warren on issues that affect the gay and lesbian community,&#039; Duran said. &#039;However, Sen. Feinstein respects the president-elect&#039;s prerogative to select a cleric to deliver the invocation.&#039; (That one doesn&#039;t need any translation -- Feinstein&#039;s office was politely, respectfully, throwing Obama under the bus.)

Warren&#039;s spokesman, A. Larry Ross, told Salon Obama had contacted Warren to invite him, not the other way around.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salon state that Dianne Feinstein&#8217;s team confirms that Warren was Obama&#8217;s pick (<a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/12/19/rick_warren/?source=newsletter" rel="nofollow">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/12/19/rick_warren/?source=newsletter</a>):</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8216;That was solely the choice of the president-elect,&#8217; said Gil Duran, a spokesman for Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the California Democrat who chairs the congressional committee. Obama&#8217;s staff sent explicit orders for whom to include in the inaugural ceremony up to Capitol Hill, since Congress is, technically, in charge of that part of the day. &#8216;Sen. Feinstein obviously disagrees with the views of Rev. Warren on issues that affect the gay and lesbian community,&#8217; Duran said. &#8216;However, Sen. Feinstein respects the president-elect&#8217;s prerogative to select a cleric to deliver the invocation.&#8217; (That one doesn&#8217;t need any translation &#8212; Feinstein&#8217;s office was politely, respectfully, throwing Obama under the bus.)</p>
<p>Warren&#8217;s spokesman, A. Larry Ross, told Salon Obama had contacted Warren to invite him, not the other way around.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mireille</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/12/18/ladies-lets-get-the-painful-part-over-first/#comment-217946</link>
		<dc:creator>Mireille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10253#comment-217946</guid>
		<description>But how is NOT inviting someone from the dominionist right snubbing as non-human?  Some people may be saying we shouldn&#039;t talk to them at all, which I can certainly sympathize with; it&#039;s hard to feel magnanimous towards someone who basically thinks you&#039;re not his equal.  But, giving him a place of honor on a world stage on an historic night...  I just don&#039;t see how this does anything but show approval, purposefully or inadvertantly, of his views.  There are so many other forums that would have been more appropriate.  And to judge from the right wing reaction, there is more furor at Warren than approval of Obama.  This was a lose-lose.  He gained no traction on the right and lost some support from the left.  Just a hugely stupid political maneuver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But how is NOT inviting someone from the dominionist right snubbing as non-human?  Some people may be saying we shouldn&#8217;t talk to them at all, which I can certainly sympathize with; it&#8217;s hard to feel magnanimous towards someone who basically thinks you&#8217;re not his equal.  But, giving him a place of honor on a world stage on an historic night&#8230;  I just don&#8217;t see how this does anything but show approval, purposefully or inadvertantly, of his views.  There are so many other forums that would have been more appropriate.  And to judge from the right wing reaction, there is more furor at Warren than approval of Obama.  This was a lose-lose.  He gained no traction on the right and lost some support from the left.  Just a hugely stupid political maneuver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristen J</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/12/18/ladies-lets-get-the-painful-part-over-first/#comment-217927</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10253#comment-217927</guid>
		<description>Er...I don&#039;t think this went through before...my browser crashed, but if it did I apologize.

&lt;i&gt;If anyone is treating others like subhumans, it’s them.&lt;/i&gt;

I believe I specifically stated that.  They aren&#039;t good people.  Not even a little.  Of course they aren&#039;t sweating it.  They don&#039;t care about other people.  Should we join their philosophy that only some people are &quot;worthy&quot;?

Believe me...I know the rights they spend their time trying to strip away.  I grew up with them telling me I couldn&#039;t wear pants!  Pants are sinful.  Its ridiculous the level they&#039;ll sink to in order to control everyone in their congregations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er&#8230;I don&#8217;t think this went through before&#8230;my browser crashed, but if it did I apologize.</p>
<p><i>If anyone is treating others like subhumans, it’s them.</i></p>
<p>I believe I specifically stated that.  They aren&#8217;t good people.  Not even a little.  Of course they aren&#8217;t sweating it.  They don&#8217;t care about other people.  Should we join their philosophy that only some people are &#8220;worthy&#8221;?</p>
<p>Believe me&#8230;I know the rights they spend their time trying to strip away.  I grew up with them telling me I couldn&#8217;t wear pants!  Pants are sinful.  Its ridiculous the level they&#8217;ll sink to in order to control everyone in their congregations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheelzebub</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/12/18/ladies-lets-get-the-painful-part-over-first/#comment-217903</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheelzebub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10253#comment-217903</guid>
		<description>Kirsten J, these religious bigots have done everything in their power to take away my right to make my own medical decisions, to marry whom I want, and to do something as mundane as take the pill.  They push for discriminatory policies towards LBGT people and women.  If anyone is treating others like subhumans, it&#039;s them.  I don&#039;t see these folks sweating the untold harm they&#039;ve done to me and others like me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirsten J, these religious bigots have done everything in their power to take away my right to make my own medical decisions, to marry whom I want, and to do something as mundane as take the pill.  They push for discriminatory policies towards LBGT people and women.  If anyone is treating others like subhumans, it&#8217;s them.  I don&#8217;t see these folks sweating the untold harm they&#8217;ve done to me and others like me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristen J</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/12/18/ladies-lets-get-the-painful-part-over-first/#comment-217892</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10253#comment-217892</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If we underestimate them too much, we’ll get Palin/Huckabee in 2012.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Vomit.   My mom actually has a Palin 2012 bumper sticker...  The Stupid....It Burns!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If we underestimate them too much, we’ll get Palin/Huckabee in 2012.</p></blockquote>
<p>Vomit.   My mom actually has a Palin 2012 bumper sticker&#8230;  The Stupid&#8230;.It Burns!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristin</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/12/18/ladies-lets-get-the-painful-part-over-first/#comment-217890</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10253#comment-217890</guid>
		<description>&quot;But this idea of non-engagement…it doesn’t work. The evangelical movement isn’t 3 guys in a basement.&quot; 

Yeah, I know.  As I said, I experience a disconnect with many, many people when it comes to assessing the actual influence of the Religious Right.  If we underestimate them too much, we&#039;ll get Palin/Huckabee in 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But this idea of non-engagement…it doesn’t work. The evangelical movement isn’t 3 guys in a basement.&#8221; </p>
<p>Yeah, I know.  As I said, I experience a disconnect with many, many people when it comes to assessing the actual influence of the Religious Right.  If we underestimate them too much, we&#8217;ll get Palin/Huckabee in 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristin</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/12/18/ladies-lets-get-the-painful-part-over-first/#comment-217889</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10253#comment-217889</guid>
		<description>Kristen: 

&quot;I think we’ll just have to agree to disagree on the size and power of the evangelical movement. I think we may have different experiences that lead us to be our opinion that Warren is centrist or radical in that movement. In my experience…he’s center left.&quot; 

Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kristen: </p>
<p>&#8220;I think we’ll just have to agree to disagree on the size and power of the evangelical movement. I think we may have different experiences that lead us to be our opinion that Warren is centrist or radical in that movement. In my experience…he’s center left.&#8221; </p>
<p>Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristen J</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2008/12/18/ladies-lets-get-the-painful-part-over-first/#comment-217872</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10253#comment-217872</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Yeah, I don’t agree that the right strategy is to just be nicer to the Religious Right. That will facilitate their ascendancy, not weaken their base.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I only mean nicer in the sense of not treating them as non-humans.  Besides if the Religious Right isn&#039;t running this country I&#039;ll eat my hat.  But I don&#039;t mean nicer in the baking them cookies sense.  Personally, I like annoying them with disgusting stories from the bible...like how Lot got his get out of destruction free card (hint, rape) or how God is like Dick Cheney:  Job and waterboarding.

I&#039;m not saying we don&#039;t point out that they&#039;re wrong.  Absolutely we point out their wrong.  But this idea of non-engagement...it doesn&#039;t work.  The evangelical movement isn&#039;t 3 guys in a basement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yeah, I don’t agree that the right strategy is to just be nicer to the Religious Right. That will facilitate their ascendancy, not weaken their base.</p></blockquote>
<p>I only mean nicer in the sense of not treating them as non-humans.  Besides if the Religious Right isn&#8217;t running this country I&#8217;ll eat my hat.  But I don&#8217;t mean nicer in the baking them cookies sense.  Personally, I like annoying them with disgusting stories from the bible&#8230;like how Lot got his get out of destruction free card (hint, rape) or how God is like Dick Cheney:  Job and waterboarding.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying we don&#8217;t point out that they&#8217;re wrong.  Absolutely we point out their wrong.  But this idea of non-engagement&#8230;it doesn&#8217;t work.  The evangelical movement isn&#8217;t 3 guys in a basement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.031 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 07:56:37 -->
