<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feminist Vandalism?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/15/feminist-vandalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/15/feminist-vandalism/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:44:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: S</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/15/feminist-vandalism/#comment-235196</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 19:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10856#comment-235196</guid>
		<description>While we’re at it, why don’t we wake up and realize that these “patriarchal beauty standards” also apply to how women DRESS (or rather their lack thereof…)
I sometimes wonder if sometime in the last 50 years a bunch of men got together and said - how can we get women to walk around in as little clothing as possible, so that we don’t have to respect them as real people and can just treat them as sex objects? And then one guy said - “OH, I know, we’ll just make it really fashionable to wear skimpy clothing, we’ll throw women’s self-esteem down the drain through impossible media standards, and we’ll call women ‘prudes’ if they refuse to show off their bodies or have sex before they’re ready.”
Sounds crazy huh? But if it wasn’t the men’s idea….we have to wonder why women (even “feminist” women) will willingly turn themselves into sex objects and call it “liberation”.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we’re at it, why don’t we wake up and realize that these “patriarchal beauty standards” also apply to how women DRESS (or rather their lack thereof…)<br />
I sometimes wonder if sometime in the last 50 years a bunch of men got together and said &#8211; how can we get women to walk around in as little clothing as possible, so that we don’t have to respect them as real people and can just treat them as sex objects? And then one guy said &#8211; “OH, I know, we’ll just make it really fashionable to wear skimpy clothing, we’ll throw women’s self-esteem down the drain through impossible media standards, and we’ll call women ‘prudes’ if they refuse to show off their bodies or have sex before they’re ready.”<br />
Sounds crazy huh? But if it wasn’t the men’s idea….we have to wonder why women (even “feminist” women) will willingly turn themselves into sex objects and call it “liberation”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bearded Miracles - An Engine, Beautiful and Strange &#187; how to reject advertisements</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/15/feminist-vandalism/#comment-223570</link>
		<dc:creator>Bearded Miracles - An Engine, Beautiful and Strange &#187; how to reject advertisements</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10856#comment-223570</guid>
		<description>[...] adding paste-ups made to look like the toolbars of a Photoshop window. See more pix and commentary here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] adding paste-ups made to look like the toolbars of a Photoshop window. See more pix and commentary here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoe&#8217;s tumblog &#187; Shared Items - January 21, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/15/feminist-vandalism/#comment-222612</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoe&#8217;s tumblog &#187; Shared Items - January 21, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10856#comment-222612</guid>
		<description>[...] Feminist Vandalism? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Feminist Vandalism? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photoshop Vandal &#171; Frugal Camera</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/15/feminist-vandalism/#comment-222469</link>
		<dc:creator>Photoshop Vandal &#171; Frugal Camera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10856#comment-222469</guid>
		<description>[...] You can see a gallery of the doctored ads here.And read more about it here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can see a gallery of the doctored ads here.And read more about it here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnFit</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/15/feminist-vandalism/#comment-222189</link>
		<dc:creator>UnFit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10856#comment-222189</guid>
		<description>I love this, no matter if it&#039;s a feminist statement or just general adbusting.

Either way, I think it&#039;s just endlessly more creative and  thought-inspiring.

There used to be those little pink stickers around here (Germany, that is) that had a double axe on them and simply said &quot;misogynist&quot;. I way prefer something a) made to fit the individual ad and b) just more subtle, with more than just one premade statement screaming at you.

Win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this, no matter if it&#8217;s a feminist statement or just general adbusting.</p>
<p>Either way, I think it&#8217;s just endlessly more creative and  thought-inspiring.</p>
<p>There used to be those little pink stickers around here (Germany, that is) that had a double axe on them and simply said &#8220;misogynist&#8221;. I way prefer something a) made to fit the individual ad and b) just more subtle, with more than just one premade statement screaming at you.</p>
<p>Win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LUX VISUAL EFFECTS INC. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Killing Facebook Friends Comes to an End</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/15/feminist-vandalism/#comment-221949</link>
		<dc:creator>LUX VISUAL EFFECTS INC. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Killing Facebook Friends Comes to an End</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10856#comment-221949</guid>
		<description>[...] the dove campaign that ruled almost every award show it was entered in. Now comes some very clever vandalism/graffiti/defacement in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the dove campaign that ruled almost every award show it was entered in. Now comes some very clever vandalism/graffiti/defacement in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photoshop Vandal &#124; Totalphotography</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/15/feminist-vandalism/#comment-221940</link>
		<dc:creator>Photoshop Vandal &#124; Totalphotography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10856#comment-221940</guid>
		<description>[...] You can see a gallery of the doctored ads here.And read more about it here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can see a gallery of the doctored ads here.And read more about it here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Looks Shopped &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This is one of those &#8220;Why didn&#8217;t I think of that?&#8221; moments&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/15/feminist-vandalism/#comment-221835</link>
		<dc:creator>This Looks Shopped &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This is one of those &#8220;Why didn&#8217;t I think of that?&#8221; moments&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10856#comment-221835</guid>
		<description>[...] Brilliant! You can see more photos of the vandal&#8217;s work on Flickr and Gizmodo. [via Feministe, Jezebel] Tags: Berlin, Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, Leona Lewis, Photoshop      This entry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brilliant! You can see more photos of the vandal&#8217;s work on Flickr and Gizmodo. [via Feministe, Jezebel] Tags: Berlin, Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, Leona Lewis, Photoshop      This entry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#34;Feminist&#34; Vandal Defaces Berlin [Photoshop Of Horrors] &#124; StalknBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/15/feminist-vandalism/#comment-221785</link>
		<dc:creator>&#34;Feminist&#34; Vandal Defaces Berlin [Photoshop Of Horrors] &#124; StalknBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10856#comment-221785</guid>
		<description>[...] computerized tweaking. As one of stickers on Britney’s poster reads, “don’t forget…” [Feministe, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] computerized tweaking. As one of stickers on Britney’s poster reads, “don’t forget…” [Feministe, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ekkaia</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/15/feminist-vandalism/#comment-221772</link>
		<dc:creator>Ekkaia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=10856#comment-221772</guid>
		<description>Well, I live in Berlin and there&#039;s actually one of those posters (in it&#039;s not-yet-vandalized form) at &quot;our&quot; U-Bahn station, too. The Berlin street-art scene generally seems to be pretty progressive/leftwing/libertarian/whatever and so forth so I think it&#039;s meant to be criticizing beauty standards and therefore feminist.
It reminds me of that art project I saw in the U-Bahn a couple of weeks ago that worked along the same lines, advertising lobotomy for example. It worked espeacially well when halb the posters at the station were real advertisements and half of them those fake ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I live in Berlin and there&#8217;s actually one of those posters (in it&#8217;s not-yet-vandalized form) at &#8220;our&#8221; U-Bahn station, too. The Berlin street-art scene generally seems to be pretty progressive/leftwing/libertarian/whatever and so forth so I think it&#8217;s meant to be criticizing beauty standards and therefore feminist.<br />
It reminds me of that art project I saw in the U-Bahn a couple of weeks ago that worked along the same lines, advertising lobotomy for example. It worked espeacially well when halb the posters at the station were real advertisements and half of them those fake ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
