<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good news about women and the stimulus package</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/29/good-news-about-women-and-the-stimulus-package/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/29/good-news-about-women-and-the-stimulus-package/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:11:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Thoughts on the Stimulus Package &#171; Women&#8217;s Glib</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/29/good-news-about-women-and-the-stimulus-package/#comment-225784</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Thoughts on the Stimulus Package &#171; Women&#8217;s Glib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 21:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=11317#comment-225784</guid>
		<description>[...] Entmacher, VP of family economic security at the National Women&#8217;s Law Center, says that the package will work on &#8220;Expanding health for them [women], child care, unemployment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Entmacher, VP of family economic security at the National Women&#8217;s Law Center, says that the package will work on &#8220;Expanding health for them [women], child care, unemployment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamelle</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/29/good-news-about-women-and-the-stimulus-package/#comment-224107</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=11317#comment-224107</guid>
		<description>And my hunch is that some form of support for family planning will either be included in the Senate version of the bill (and brought in to the final version during the reconciliation process), or a separate bill will be passed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And my hunch is that some form of support for family planning will either be included in the Senate version of the bill (and brought in to the final version during the reconciliation process), or a separate bill will be passed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icewyche</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/29/good-news-about-women-and-the-stimulus-package/#comment-224105</link>
		<dc:creator>Icewyche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=11317#comment-224105</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know...a lot of what people are lauding as &quot;good for women&quot; is actually geared toward children and women with children - childcare, Head Start, energy assistance, food stamps, investments in programs for disabled kids, expanding SCHIP.  Even jobs the jobs mentioned above involve dealing with kids.  I&#039;m childfree - I don&#039;t have kids, I don&#039;t want kids, I don&#039;t deal with kids.  What do I and women like me get out of this much-lauded stimulus package?  Yes, I know that women carry the major burden of child rearing, but when are people going to learn that &quot;children&#039;s issues&quot; are not synonymous with &quot;women&#039;s issues&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know&#8230;a lot of what people are lauding as &#8220;good for women&#8221; is actually geared toward children and women with children &#8211; childcare, Head Start, energy assistance, food stamps, investments in programs for disabled kids, expanding SCHIP.  Even jobs the jobs mentioned above involve dealing with kids.  I&#8217;m childfree &#8211; I don&#8217;t have kids, I don&#8217;t want kids, I don&#8217;t deal with kids.  What do I and women like me get out of this much-lauded stimulus package?  Yes, I know that women carry the major burden of child rearing, but when are people going to learn that &#8220;children&#8217;s issues&#8221; are not synonymous with &#8220;women&#8217;s issues&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gogojojo</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/29/good-news-about-women-and-the-stimulus-package/#comment-224036</link>
		<dc:creator>gogojojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=11317#comment-224036</guid>
		<description>Glad to hear it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halloween in Washington: Analysis of Obama&#8217;s Stimulus Plan : WesternFront America</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/01/29/good-news-about-women-and-the-stimulus-package/#comment-224007</link>
		<dc:creator>Halloween in Washington: Analysis of Obama&#8217;s Stimulus Plan : WesternFront America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=11317#comment-224007</guid>
		<description>[...] Feministe » Good news about women and the stimulus package [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Feministe » Good news about women and the stimulus package [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 15/21 queries in 0.031 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 09:23:30 -->
