<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thursday LOST Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/02/12/thursday-lost-blogging-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/02/12/thursday-lost-blogging-2/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:34:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Daisy Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/02/12/thursday-lost-blogging-2/#comment-226967</link>
		<dc:creator>Daisy Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 05:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=11671#comment-226967</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But while we’re having a debate around hypothetical scenarios that are likely to never happen on the show, do you think that Jack would have been anymore likely to risk Kate for Sun than he would be for Sawyer?&lt;/i&gt;

Ooo, good one. Pregnant Sun? Yes. Not pregnant Sun? I don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But while we’re having a debate around hypothetical scenarios that are likely to never happen on the show, do you think that Jack would have been anymore likely to risk Kate for Sun than he would be for Sawyer?</i></p>
<p>Ooo, good one. Pregnant Sun? Yes. Not pregnant Sun? I don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spicy_Carrot</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/02/12/thursday-lost-blogging-2/#comment-226875</link>
		<dc:creator>Spicy_Carrot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=11671#comment-226875</guid>
		<description>Due to Charlotte&#039;s death, I don&#039;t think that Charlotte is Annie. I figured it was a possibility while she was alive but I think the show would&#039;ve made that reveal while Charlotte was alive, not posthumously. Although considering how Lost deals with death, I guess it&#039;s a possibility her story isn&#039;t over yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Due to Charlotte&#8217;s death, I don&#8217;t think that Charlotte is Annie. I figured it was a possibility while she was alive but I think the show would&#8217;ve made that reveal while Charlotte was alive, not posthumously. Although considering how Lost deals with death, I guess it&#8217;s a possibility her story isn&#8217;t over yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cara</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/02/12/thursday-lost-blogging-2/#comment-226849</link>
		<dc:creator>Cara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=11671#comment-226849</guid>
		<description>With regards to the LOST vagina curse (especially sine I&#039;ve apparently already convinced you, Daisy!), all I&#039;m going to say is that as soon as I saw Charlotte for the first time, I thought to myself &quot;oh yay, a new female character! Finally!&quot;  Then I turned to my husband and said &quot;let&#039;s hope they don&#039;t kill this one, too.&quot;  Seriously.  Actually happened.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Secondly, I’m really not sure Jack would have risked Kate to save Sawyer. Jack didn’t stop Sawyer from jumping out of the helicopter — do you think he would have stopped him if he’d had the chance?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I do agree with your points prior to that one.  But men have saved other men on the show, or at least attempted to, and risked their lives to do so.  I also think the helicopter was different, as it was low enough to the water and Sawyer a strong enough swimmer to reasonably assume that he would be okay.  I think that getting him to the boat versus him actually dying is a different story.

Then again, they admittedly would have likely never committed this scenario.  But while we&#039;re having a debate around hypothetical scenarios that are likely to never happen on the show, do you think that Jack would have been anymore likely to risk Kate for &lt;i&gt;Sun&lt;/i&gt; than he would be for Sawyer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regards to the LOST vagina curse (especially sine I&#8217;ve apparently already convinced you, Daisy!), all I&#8217;m going to say is that as soon as I saw Charlotte for the first time, I thought to myself &#8220;oh yay, a new female character! Finally!&#8221;  Then I turned to my husband and said &#8220;let&#8217;s hope they don&#8217;t kill this one, too.&#8221;  Seriously.  Actually happened.</p>
<blockquote><p>Secondly, I’m really not sure Jack would have risked Kate to save Sawyer. Jack didn’t stop Sawyer from jumping out of the helicopter — do you think he would have stopped him if he’d had the chance?</p></blockquote>
<p>I do agree with your points prior to that one.  But men have saved other men on the show, or at least attempted to, and risked their lives to do so.  I also think the helicopter was different, as it was low enough to the water and Sawyer a strong enough swimmer to reasonably assume that he would be okay.  I think that getting him to the boat versus him actually dying is a different story.</p>
<p>Then again, they admittedly would have likely never committed this scenario.  But while we&#8217;re having a debate around hypothetical scenarios that are likely to never happen on the show, do you think that Jack would have been anymore likely to risk Kate for <i>Sun</i> than he would be for Sawyer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daisy Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/02/12/thursday-lost-blogging-2/#comment-226810</link>
		<dc:creator>Daisy Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=11671#comment-226810</guid>
		<description>Cara, those are good points about Naomi and Charlotte and other short-lived female characters, I hadn&#039;t thought f it quite that way. And you&#039;re right that men and women dying at equal rates actually is disproportionate since there are fewer women to begin with. So, points fully conceded there.

&lt;i&gt;And while I think you’re right that Jack definitely would have gone back for Kate, I think that’s just about the fact that he’s in love with her more than the fact that she’s a woman. I honestly do think that Jack would have insisted on getting Sawyer, too (because despite their constant arguments those two totally do love each other).&lt;/i&gt;

Two things. Firstly, the fact that Jack is in love with her is not unrelated to the fact that she&#039;s a woman. The show (like most mainstream media) is from the straight male perspective -- the love interest getting saved is &lt;i&gt;always&lt;/i&gt; a woman. Jin is Sun&#039;s love interest, but that doesn&#039;t matter vis-a-vis getting saved.

Secondly, I&#039;m really not sure Jack would have risked Kate to save Sawyer. Jack didn&#039;t stop Sawyer from jumping out of the helicopter -- do you think he would have stopped him if he&#039;d had the chance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cara, those are good points about Naomi and Charlotte and other short-lived female characters, I hadn&#8217;t thought f it quite that way. And you&#8217;re right that men and women dying at equal rates actually is disproportionate since there are fewer women to begin with. So, points fully conceded there.</p>
<p><i>And while I think you’re right that Jack definitely would have gone back for Kate, I think that’s just about the fact that he’s in love with her more than the fact that she’s a woman. I honestly do think that Jack would have insisted on getting Sawyer, too (because despite their constant arguments those two totally do love each other).</i></p>
<p>Two things. Firstly, the fact that Jack is in love with her is not unrelated to the fact that she&#8217;s a woman. The show (like most mainstream media) is from the straight male perspective &#8212; the love interest getting saved is <i>always</i> a woman. Jin is Sun&#8217;s love interest, but that doesn&#8217;t matter vis-a-vis getting saved.</p>
<p>Secondly, I&#8217;m really not sure Jack would have risked Kate to save Sawyer. Jack didn&#8217;t stop Sawyer from jumping out of the helicopter &#8212; do you think he would have stopped him if he&#8217;d had the chance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel S.</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/02/12/thursday-lost-blogging-2/#comment-226723</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=11671#comment-226723</guid>
		<description>I think that the woman stuck in time back in England (who was part of Faraday&#039;s experiment) is Charlotte&#039;s mom (or even Charlotte herself? Twin? Something?). There were too many visual similarities between the scene when Charlotte was dying and the scene when Desmond goes to see the woman in the coma (or whatever). The hair, the crossed hands, the mumbling through time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the woman stuck in time back in England (who was part of Faraday&#8217;s experiment) is Charlotte&#8217;s mom (or even Charlotte herself? Twin? Something?). There were too many visual similarities between the scene when Charlotte was dying and the scene when Desmond goes to see the woman in the coma (or whatever). The hair, the crossed hands, the mumbling through time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.M. Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/02/12/thursday-lost-blogging-2/#comment-226684</link>
		<dc:creator>E.M. Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=11671#comment-226684</guid>
		<description>I just want to know what the dealio is with Smokey the smoke monster.  There was the machinery/clunking sounds when he was out and about again.  What&#039;s that line from Evolution?  &quot;Black dude always dies first.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to know what the dealio is with Smokey the smoke monster.  There was the machinery/clunking sounds when he was out and about again.  What&#8217;s that line from Evolution?  &#8220;Black dude always dies first.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/02/12/thursday-lost-blogging-2/#comment-226675</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=11671#comment-226675</guid>
		<description>&quot;Also, the stupidity of some of the characters right now is mind-numbing. Locke tells Sawyer, Juliet, Daniel, Charlotte, Miles, and Jin that he’s going to leave the island via the Orchid. Why wouldn’t they try to come with him, or follow him? Or even ask if they could come? And if Jin cut the rope … so what? Isn’t there more rope? Couldn’t they use vines from the jungle or something? Argh.&quot;

Actually, Jin *did* try to go with Locke, he stated that he was going with him.  But I don&#039;t think it is lacking in logic that they believe Locke when he says it can only be a single person, and if the point is to bring the others *back* it creates more potential trouble if even more of them leave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Also, the stupidity of some of the characters right now is mind-numbing. Locke tells Sawyer, Juliet, Daniel, Charlotte, Miles, and Jin that he’s going to leave the island via the Orchid. Why wouldn’t they try to come with him, or follow him? Or even ask if they could come? And if Jin cut the rope … so what? Isn’t there more rope? Couldn’t they use vines from the jungle or something? Argh.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, Jin *did* try to go with Locke, he stated that he was going with him.  But I don&#8217;t think it is lacking in logic that they believe Locke when he says it can only be a single person, and if the point is to bring the others *back* it creates more potential trouble if even more of them leave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Tramp</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/02/12/thursday-lost-blogging-2/#comment-226671</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Tramp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=11671#comment-226671</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;no one gets their arm violently ripped off, then is well enough to sound like that guy did&lt;/i&gt;

I assumed that was the smoke monster imitating him.  Remember, it&#039;s definitely imitated Yemi (Eko&#039;s brother) and may have appeared in the guise of any number of other characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>no one gets their arm violently ripped off, then is well enough to sound like that guy did</i></p>
<p>I assumed that was the smoke monster imitating him.  Remember, it&#8217;s definitely imitated Yemi (Eko&#8217;s brother) and may have appeared in the guise of any number of other characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/02/12/thursday-lost-blogging-2/#comment-226666</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=11671#comment-226666</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, because she’s planning to go back to the island? Forever? Did they just not clue her in on the FOREVER aspect yet, and that’s why she’s not worried? That could be it. Maybe she just thinks it’s a temporary trip or something.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ohh right I didn&#039;t think about that. I just assumed she thought it was temporary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Well, because she’s planning to go back to the island? Forever? Did they just not clue her in on the FOREVER aspect yet, and that’s why she’s not worried? That could be it. Maybe she just thinks it’s a temporary trip or something.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ohh right I didn&#8217;t think about that. I just assumed she thought it was temporary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cara</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/02/12/thursday-lost-blogging-2/#comment-226658</link>
		<dc:creator>Cara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=11671#comment-226658</guid>
		<description>Well I think that Des is an indisputably larger character.

I agree that they definitely add more male characters to the show, but isn&#039;t that all the more reason to not kill off the female ones?  We got 4 tail section people, split evenly -- only one man got to live.  We got 5 main freighter people, Naomi, Daniel, Miles, Charlotte and Frank.  Frank left the island, Naomi and Charlotte both end up dead, Daniel and Miles fine.  Danielle brought on as extra female character, lasted a long time but now dead.  Alex, dead.

This is the thing -- they clearly &lt;i&gt;need&lt;/i&gt; more female characters on the show, but every time they introduce one, they keep fucking killing them!  It&#039;s not that they&#039;re necessarily killing more men than women, it&#039;s that they&#039;re killing a hugely disproportionate number of women total to the number on the show.

And while I think you&#039;re right that Jack definitely would have gone back for Kate, I think that&#039;s just about the fact that he&#039;s in love with her more than the fact that she&#039;s a woman.  I honestly do think that Jack would have insisted on getting Sawyer, too (because despite their constant arguments those two totally do love each other).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think that Des is an indisputably larger character.</p>
<p>I agree that they definitely add more male characters to the show, but isn&#8217;t that all the more reason to not kill off the female ones?  We got 4 tail section people, split evenly &#8212; only one man got to live.  We got 5 main freighter people, Naomi, Daniel, Miles, Charlotte and Frank.  Frank left the island, Naomi and Charlotte both end up dead, Daniel and Miles fine.  Danielle brought on as extra female character, lasted a long time but now dead.  Alex, dead.</p>
<p>This is the thing &#8212; they clearly <i>need</i> more female characters on the show, but every time they introduce one, they keep fucking killing them!  It&#8217;s not that they&#8217;re necessarily killing more men than women, it&#8217;s that they&#8217;re killing a hugely disproportionate number of women total to the number on the show.</p>
<p>And while I think you&#8217;re right that Jack definitely would have gone back for Kate, I think that&#8217;s just about the fact that he&#8217;s in love with her more than the fact that she&#8217;s a woman.  I honestly do think that Jack would have insisted on getting Sawyer, too (because despite their constant arguments those two totally do love each other).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.037 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 06:50:27 -->
