<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: N.Y. Gov. Paterson will introduce same-sex marriage bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/04/14/ny-gov-paterson-will-introduce-same-sex-marriage-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/04/14/ny-gov-paterson-will-introduce-same-sex-marriage-bill/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:18:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RyanRutley</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/04/14/ny-gov-paterson-will-introduce-same-sex-marriage-bill/#comment-237237</link>
		<dc:creator>RyanRutley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=12850#comment-237237</guid>
		<description>Jill, I&#039;ve been keeping my eye on this story (translation: I watch Maddow), and I&#039;m wondering if this might be a legacy Hail Mary.  I get the impression that Gov. Paterson is an intelligent man, and is not seriously considering running for re-election given his approval rating.  He may (rightly or wrongly) see this as an opportunity to pass into law policy that he personally supports, and damn the political consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jill, I&#8217;ve been keeping my eye on this story (translation: I watch Maddow), and I&#8217;m wondering if this might be a legacy Hail Mary.  I get the impression that Gov. Paterson is an intelligent man, and is not seriously considering running for re-election given his approval rating.  He may (rightly or wrongly) see this as an opportunity to pass into law policy that he personally supports, and damn the political consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Oxford Murders (2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/04/14/ny-gov-paterson-will-introduce-same-sex-marriage-bill/#comment-236972</link>
		<dc:creator>The Oxford Murders (2008)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=12850#comment-236972</guid>
		<description>[...] Feministe » N.Y. Gov. Paterson will introduce same-sex marriage bill [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Feministe » N.Y. Gov. Paterson will introduce same-sex marriage bill [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cara</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/04/14/ny-gov-paterson-will-introduce-same-sex-marriage-bill/#comment-236852</link>
		<dc:creator>Cara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=12850#comment-236852</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;d really, really love to see this go through, but agree with E that GENDA (anti-discrimination legislation protecting gender nonconforming people) should be the priority right now.  I plan to go to Equality and Justice Day in Albany in a couple of weeks (the LGBT lobby day), and it&#039;s the primary reason I&#039;m going.  Thankfully, the Pride Agenda seemed to me to be pushing it even harder last year than marriage equality and seems to have the same priorities this year, which I think is a very good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;d really, really love to see this go through, but agree with E that GENDA (anti-discrimination legislation protecting gender nonconforming people) should be the priority right now.  I plan to go to Equality and Justice Day in Albany in a couple of weeks (the LGBT lobby day), and it&#8217;s the primary reason I&#8217;m going.  Thankfully, the Pride Agenda seemed to me to be pushing it even harder last year than marriage equality and seems to have the same priorities this year, which I think is a very good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/04/14/ny-gov-paterson-will-introduce-same-sex-marriage-bill/#comment-236848</link>
		<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=12850#comment-236848</guid>
		<description>It would be awesome to see this finally go through in NY, but wouldn&#039;t it be better if he&#039;d actually listened to the people who&#039;ve already been working on this issue? A no vote from the state senate on this could be a disaster, and he doesn&#039;t care. Not to mention GENDA could use some attention as well, and since I don&#039;t know of any Democrats in the NYS senate who&#039;ve made killing that their pet issue (dear Ruben Diaz: DIAF), it might have a better chance at passing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be awesome to see this finally go through in NY, but wouldn&#8217;t it be better if he&#8217;d actually listened to the people who&#8217;ve already been working on this issue? A no vote from the state senate on this could be a disaster, and he doesn&#8217;t care. Not to mention GENDA could use some attention as well, and since I don&#8217;t know of any Democrats in the NYS senate who&#8217;ve made killing that their pet issue (dear Ruben Diaz: DIAF), it might have a better chance at passing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
