Great article here detailing many of her most important decisions and views. Check it out.
(or browse the Archives by date, category, tags etc)
get blog updates
Recent Comments
- Calderon on This Is What Happened to CeCe
- Kristin Rawls on “Kill the Gays” Bill is Back in Uganda
- karak on This Is What Happened to CeCe
- Redlark on This Is What Happened to CeCe
- Joe from an alternate universe on This Is What Happened to CeCe
- Sarah Harper on The Annual Post About Sexist Super Bowl Commercials 2012
- LotusBen on Prudie on “real” rape
- Annie D on This Is What Happened to CeCe
- Annie D on This Is What Happened to CeCe
- Jadey on This Is What Happened to CeCe
Most Commented Recent Posts
- An Asexual Map for Sex-Positive Feminism (138)
- Women refuses to give raped daughter EC, brags about it on internet. (129)
- So should we just start calling high heels "body modification"? (128)
- Some Transformative Justice Links (127)
- Prudie on "real" rape (112)
- FNTT Season 8, Round 1: the "So a girl and a vibrator walk onto a plane..." edition (89)
- FNTT Season 8, Round 1: the REAL FEMINISTS edition (77)
- "Kill the Gays" Bill is Back in Uganda (74)
- Facts, myths, and blankety-blank lies about Planned Parenthood and the Susan G. Komen Foundation (65)
- FNTT Season 8, Round 1: The Baby-Killing Whores Edition (63)
Yes Means Yes!
We’re in the Guardian

More of Feministe On
For wordpress.com support
just for you, a widget as requested
Sponsored By
Tried and Tested
The authors of this website have hand-selected these titles because we believe they may be of interest to a feminist audience.
Consider them for gifts to friends, family, or yourself! We do receive some income if you choose to order these titles based on our recommendations. All funds help support our costs to provide this space.
Consider them for gifts to friends, family, or yourself! We do receive some income if you choose to order these titles based on our recommendations. All funds help support our costs to provide this space.



NYT also had an article today in which Judge Sotomayor basically explains what we’ve been talking about around the blogs for a couple of weeks – that life experience as a woman or a member of a minority group is in itself a qualification.
I don’t care what her other qualifications are, she’s bad on the first amendment, bad on the fourth amendment, and thinks its perfectly OK to admit hearsay for a 115 month “sentence enhancement.” All she needs is a pro-life pedigree and she’d practically be another Scalia.
Well….here we go. I didn’t look at her too closely beforehand, where is she bad on the first & fourth amendments?
As for her being pro-life…she is Catholic, it isn’t out of the realm of possibility. Whether it effects her legal decisions is a different matter.
She’s not always bad on the First Amendment; sometimes she’s quite good. I think William is referring to a case where Sotomayor’s 2nd Circuit panel held that a public school did not violate a student’s First Amendment rights when they suspended her for inappropriate comments she made on her LiveJournal (or some other website). It was a bad decision, but not her only one.
*Not suspended. Disqualified from running for student government.
[...] Comments Jill on Sotomayor 101Jill on Sotomayor 101chava on Sotomayor 101TAN on DoubleX on GawkerSoma on Target Women: LaundryRuth [...]