<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sotomayor 101</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/05/15/sotomayor-101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/05/15/sotomayor-101/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:12:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Feministe » Sonia Sotomayor nominated for the Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/05/15/sotomayor-101/#comment-243002</link>
		<dc:creator>Feministe » Sonia Sotomayor nominated for the Supreme Court</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 16:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=13434#comment-243002</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments Jill on Sotomayor 101Jill on Sotomayor 101chava on Sotomayor 101TAN on DoubleX on GawkerSoma on Target Women: LaundryRuth [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments Jill on Sotomayor 101Jill on Sotomayor 101chava on Sotomayor 101TAN on DoubleX on GawkerSoma on Target Women: LaundryRuth [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/05/15/sotomayor-101/#comment-243001</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 16:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=13434#comment-243001</guid>
		<description>*Not suspended.  Disqualified from running for student government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Not suspended.  Disqualified from running for student government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/05/15/sotomayor-101/#comment-243000</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 16:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=13434#comment-243000</guid>
		<description>She&#039;s not always bad on the First Amendment; sometimes she&#039;s quite good.  I think William is referring to a case where Sotomayor&#039;s 2nd Circuit panel held that a public school did not violate a student&#039;s First Amendment rights when they suspended her for inappropriate comments she made on her LiveJournal (or some other website).  It was a bad decision, but not her only one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s not always bad on the First Amendment; sometimes she&#8217;s quite good.  I think William is referring to a case where Sotomayor&#8217;s 2nd Circuit panel held that a public school did not violate a student&#8217;s First Amendment rights when they suspended her for inappropriate comments she made on her LiveJournal (or some other website).  It was a bad decision, but not her only one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chava</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/05/15/sotomayor-101/#comment-242998</link>
		<dc:creator>chava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=13434#comment-242998</guid>
		<description>Well....here we go.  I didn&#039;t look at her too closely beforehand, where is she bad on the first &amp; fourth amendments?

As for her being pro-life...she is Catholic, it isn&#039;t out of the realm of possibility.  Whether it effects her legal decisions is a different matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;.here we go.  I didn&#8217;t look at her too closely beforehand, where is she bad on the first &amp; fourth amendments?</p>
<p>As for her being pro-life&#8230;she is Catholic, it isn&#8217;t out of the realm of possibility.  Whether it effects her legal decisions is a different matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/05/15/sotomayor-101/#comment-241832</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 22:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=13434#comment-241832</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care what her other qualifications are, she&#039;s bad on the first amendment, bad on the fourth amendment, and thinks its perfectly OK to admit hearsay for a 115 month &quot;sentence enhancement.&quot; All she needs is a pro-life pedigree and she&#039;d practically be another Scalia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care what her other qualifications are, she&#8217;s bad on the first amendment, bad on the fourth amendment, and thinks its perfectly OK to admit hearsay for a 115 month &#8220;sentence enhancement.&#8221; All she needs is a pro-life pedigree and she&#8217;d practically be another Scalia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/05/15/sotomayor-101/#comment-241828</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 21:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=13434#comment-241828</guid>
		<description>NYT also had an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/15/us/15judge.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; today in which Judge Sotomayor basically explains what we&#039;ve been talking about around the blogs for a couple of weeks - that life experience as a woman or a member of a minority group &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; in itself a qualification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NYT also had an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/15/us/15judge.html" rel="nofollow">article</a> today in which Judge Sotomayor basically explains what we&#8217;ve been talking about around the blogs for a couple of weeks &#8211; that life experience as a woman or a member of a minority group <i>is</i> in itself a qualification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.029 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 03:25:33 -->
