Author: has written 5299 posts for this blog.

Jill began blogging for Feministe in 2005. She has since written as a weekly columnist for the Guardian newspaper and in April 2014 she was appointed as senior political writer for Cosmopolitan magazine.
Return to: Homepage | Blog Index

12 Responses

  1. Cara
    Cara May 29, 2009 at 1:50 pm |

    Hey! Hateful white-dude-guy! You’re a loud, ignorant asshole who is willing to cash in on racism and sexism! Here are your own radio and TV shows!

    LMAO. God I hate Glenn Beck. And this describes him perfectly.

  2. Natalie
    Natalie May 29, 2009 at 2:22 pm |

    Also? The hoods and nooses are kind of important factors.


  3. Maggie
    Maggie May 29, 2009 at 2:50 pm |

    Ugh, the affirmative action write-off is sickening. um, how many white men have gotten into college/high-profile jobs by the “old boy’s club” connections rather than purely on their merit? hmm, a former president comes to mind…

  4. Nancy Green
    Nancy Green May 29, 2009 at 4:01 pm |

    I highlighted some of the ‘dog whistle’ phrases in senate comments here…

    For instance, calling her Ms. Sotomayor instead of Judge Sotomayor.

  5. Hershele Ostropoler
    Hershele Ostropoler May 30, 2009 at 8:58 am |

    Even if all her academic achievements—not just getting into where she did, but making the grades she did—were a result of tokenism (which they weren’t), her accomplishments as an adult are all her. Once you’re past 30 or so your long-ago academic record gets increasingly irrelevant.

  6. catfood
    catfood May 30, 2009 at 9:53 am |

    Where did I read this? Anyway, when Sotomayor was admitted to undergrad studies at Princeton, the school had only recently gone co-ed on the condition that women could only occupy new seats in the incoming classes. In other words, most positions were reserved exclusively for men.

    Sotomayor got into Princeton on quota system, sure–one that made it exceptionally hard for women to get in.

  7. Judy O
    Judy O May 30, 2009 at 3:05 pm |

    Before she gets the nod from the women’s right community I think she has to explain why she ruled against family planning in the only court case about women’s choice. I mean how the heck can we help the women’s health in countries around the world if we have judges that rule the way she did in Center for Reproductive Law and Policy v. Bush? If she rules this way on women’s health how will she rule on stem cell research?

  8. Lauren
    Lauren May 30, 2009 at 11:31 pm |

    G Gordon Liddy only makes public statements when he’s on his period. That’s how he manages to sound so consistently stupid and angry all the time.

  9. Femmostroppo Reader - June 1, 2009 — Hoyden About Town

    […] Racism, Sexism and Sotomayor, in a few easy-to-read bullet points. […]

  10. All the News in Fits of Print – 5/31 « Media Gadfly

    […] [FEMINISTE] RACISM, SEXISM, AND SOTOMAYOR, IN A FEW EASY-TO-READ BULLET POINTS. Sonia Sotomayor is a judge. It is her job to ask questions. Many judges — including, notably, Antonin Scalia — are known for their assertive styles and difficult questions. Scalia, though, is revered for his blunt style. Sotomayor’s “temperment” is discussed as if she were a racehorse or a dog being bred for certain characteristics. I wonder if a male justice would be regularly described as “strident” and “vocal”? Also, this comment: “She used her questioning to make a point,” he said, “as opposed to really looking for an answer to a question she did not understand” could just as easily describe Scalia or any other sitting Supreme Court justice. Part of the question-asking process is to challenge the attorney’s position, not just to clarify. […]

  11. belledame222
    belledame222 June 1, 2009 at 12:35 am |

    Also? The hoods and nooses are kind of important factors.

    I know, right?

    “It’s just like murder, only without the killing or the dead person at the end.”

  12. » Dear Conservatives: Racist Does Not Mean “Not White” - Wired For Noise

    […] Racism, Sexism and Sotomayor, in a few easy-to-read bullet points. […]

Comments are closed.

The commenting period has expired for this post. If you wish to re-open the discussion, please do so in the latest Open Thread.