It’s that time again. Vote for your favorite troll below the fold. We’ll be having a run-off over the next two weeks to see who will be named Feministe’s Next Top Troll.
Really?, from Sexist Superbowl Ads:
hmm, are you fat, ugly, or both? Truly attractive, happy, and confident women don’t actually have problems with these sorts of adds. They’re funny, and effective marketing.
You need to grow up a bit and tune into life before you miss it all.
RichPort’s Gay Ghost’s Schlong, from Sonia Sotomayor nominated for the Supreme Court:
I love the smell of Feminazis in the morning, … It smells of inferiority, fear, envy, hate, and a healthy dose of self-loathing.
Sotomayor is clearly unqualified to sit on the Supreme Court. Her oft-quoted stereotypical statement on the relative superior judgement of latina women versus white males should give all reasonable people serious pause for thought, as this statement is undeniably sexist, delusional, and politically stupid. Several of her judgements leave her open to well-deserved criticism, especially her position that white firefighters should be persecuted and denied the opportunities afforded to minorities with inferior demonstrated abilities, purely on the basis of their race. Such convoluted and indefensible logic implies that if you were born white, you clearly deserve to be punished, because you must have had benefits that minorities weren’t afforded at some time, and karma’s a b*tch, or some such sh*t.
Sotomayor is a racist, a sexist, an entitlement baby, a Catholic ( after all, we need more Catholics on the Supreme Court because 67% isn’t enough to adequately represent the 23% found in the U.S. population ), and she’s clearly not the sharpest tool in the shed. If you still think she’s the most qualified candidate ( and you haven’t heard of Diane Wood ), at least be honest. You only like her because she’s fat, dumb, lazy, and probably a bull dyke lesbian, just like you.
Rich was so far ahead with the name, it was no contest.
The pseudo-intellectual tone is offset so brilliantly with the infantile name-calling at the end.
Now can somebody clue me in on his self-chosen sobriquet?
Rich managed to say all the fat, ugly shit that Really? said…but added so much more in there…like paragraphs and paragraphs! I did think it was cute that confident women aren’t bothered by the “adds” as opposed to “ads”.
I really like Rich’s sticking to every right wing talking point on Sotomayor. Do they send out a mass e-mail or something? I want in on that. I won’t ever have to form my own opinion on anything ever again!!
The first one was short and sweet–it said essentially the same thing as the second, but condensed.
“a bulldyke lesbian” for the win. Dumbass.
Rich, absolutely. The irony of him saying Catholics are overrepresented while ignoring the relative representation of women and Hispanics…
Wow. It really wasn’t a contest for me. RichPort’s Gay Ghost’s Schlong for the win! ‘cos I’m totally a fat dumb lazy bull dyke lesbian. Where’s my SCOTUS seat, huh?
It had to be Rich for the accusation of hate and fear in the first paragraph….followed immediately by his own hate and fear in the second. Smoothly done!
It was “Really?” all the way until the Catholic thing made my irony meter go through the roof. Sometimes brevity is the soul of wit, and sometimes the amazing non-sequitor in the middle of a long talking-point rant casts everything into harsh relief.
Does anyone understand why he comments on Diane Woods?
see, neither of these impress me enough to want to vote for them. They’re. . . background assholery, is the best I can give them. sorry guys.
I had to vote for Really? because Rich bored me before the end of the first paragraph. I’ve red his shtick before and I’ll read it again. *sigh*
Close. Both posts display unintentional irony (the very best kind)–where they demonstrate the very qualities they accuse teh feminists of having.
But Rich’s name, coupled with his spittle-aspirating novel of a tirade shows effort. He’s hungry for the prize, ladies!
A bull dyke lesbian? As opposed to all those heterosexual bull dykes who shoot him down at bars?
Really? all the way. I absolutely the way that they implied anyone who finds a problem with sexist, demeaning ads isn’t healthy. They repeated a standard of those who seek to uphold hierachy. The classic move is to say: That wasn’t offensive. You’re the one with a problem for reading something offensive in to it. And notice how to be happy and confident you must be attractive (let’s guess they’re using superbowl commercial ruberic)? Loved it.
RichPort for managing to be both anti-Catholic and anti-gay.
Awesome Pee-Wee Herman reference!
“It smells of inferiority, fear, envy, hate, and a healthy dose of self-loathing.”
That’s your upper lip, dude.
Rich, coz he made an offensive comment about women, homosexuals, and over-weight people all in one sentence. I mean, c’mon. Really only got one of those in there.
Rich, because I love seeing people losing their shit over Sotomayor.
Had to go with Really? because Rich just went on and on–stop, I already know you’re a dickwad.
Rich gets my vote, because he’s so utterly from another planet. Judge Satomayor’s smart, she’s funny, she’s well-educated, she’s tough on litigators who come before her (as she should be) in the appellate arena where her performance has been excellent. I blogged about Judge Sotomayor’s society-regulation powder blue outfit in the room of [boring white male] suits and what the image says about the state of sexual politics, here.
Or if I have my usual low-tech luck with html (computer savvy obviously not on the y chromosome), you can click on my name to this comment, and then the category Sotomayor at the fledgling pro-feminist blog.
As long as you don’t vote me as one of your favorite inadvertent trolls, like under Dorothy’s photo from Oz … then again, it’s wildly funny to read this section, see the images, LOL to the point of my ribs hurting, even more than when I laugh at myself trying to blog after almost flunking typing class that summer.
Rich. For his robot-like regurgitation of every republican blowhard opposing Satomayor. It must be nice, and quite a time saver, to never have to think for yourself.
Rich and his schlong, no question
I can just see the spittle spraying all over his Aryan Nation under-oos
I was happily bopping along, and then my eyes did this full stop, and I really was forced, I tell ya, FORCED! to re-read every thing in his post up to the point where he declares that she is unqualified because she’s a Catholic.
You don’t see that kind of naked bigotry publicly displayed much anymore. It’s like a harjening back to the Good Olde Days of the Gentleman’s Agreement.