<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Espada&#8217;s defection hurts more than just the Dems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/06/17/espadas-defection-hurts-more-than-just-the-dems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/06/17/espadas-defection-hurts-more-than-just-the-dems/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:11:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/06/17/espadas-defection-hurts-more-than-just-the-dems/#comment-246562</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=13987#comment-246562</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://newyork.craigslist.org/search/hhh?query=%22no%20programs%22&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Craigslist search for &quot;no programs&quot;&lt;/a&gt; gets entries...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://newyork.craigslist.org/search/hhh?query=%22no%20programs%22" rel="nofollow">Craigslist search for &#8220;no programs&#8221;</a> gets entries&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/06/17/espadas-defection-hurts-more-than-just-the-dems/#comment-246560</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=13987#comment-246560</guid>
		<description>Idk there are plenty of people in shelters with vouchers, who can&#039;t find housing.  Sometimes shelters try to make (or succeed) people take SROs that eat up vouchers (or illegal 3/4 housing).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Idk there are plenty of people in shelters with vouchers, who can&#8217;t find housing.  Sometimes shelters try to make (or succeed) people take SROs that eat up vouchers (or illegal 3/4 housing).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/06/17/espadas-defection-hurts-more-than-just-the-dems/#comment-246559</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=13987#comment-246559</guid>
		<description>Oh I guess what it is, if they have a certain number of apartments they are not allowed to discriminate, otherwise they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I guess what it is, if they have a certain number of apartments they are not allowed to discriminate, otherwise they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/06/17/espadas-defection-hurts-more-than-just-the-dems/#comment-246558</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=13987#comment-246558</guid>
		<description>You know, actually (looking online) it actually IS illegal for them to discriminate on Section 8/income source, as of like a year ago, it just is not always enforced.  Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, actually (looking online) it actually IS illegal for them to discriminate on Section 8/income source, as of like a year ago, it just is not always enforced.  Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/06/17/espadas-defection-hurts-more-than-just-the-dems/#comment-246557</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=13987#comment-246557</guid>
		<description>But I would like to say, someone was talking about Manhattan, does not just affect Manhattan, affects all the boroughs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I would like to say, someone was talking about Manhattan, does not just affect Manhattan, affects all the boroughs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/06/17/espadas-defection-hurts-more-than-just-the-dems/#comment-246556</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=13987#comment-246556</guid>
		<description>Fuck it just struck me, I should have left this to all the lawyers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck it just struck me, I should have left this to all the lawyers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/06/17/espadas-defection-hurts-more-than-just-the-dems/#comment-246553</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=13987#comment-246553</guid>
		<description>Also I don&#039;t think there&#039;s anything in rent stabilization about housing discrimination, I think those are separate laws.  But I am not an expert.  I know a most what I know from housing activists and reading online.

I do know they definitely still can do credit checks and income requirements on rent-stabilized.  :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anything in rent stabilization about housing discrimination, I think those are separate laws.  But I am not an expert.  I know a most what I know from housing activists and reading online.</p>
<p>I do know they definitely still can do credit checks and income requirements on rent-stabilized.  :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/06/17/espadas-defection-hurts-more-than-just-the-dems/#comment-246551</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=13987#comment-246551</guid>
		<description>But William.  Chicago must be much better than NYC on the things that you mention.  In NYC landlords can discriminate against Section 8 and not a lot of them take it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But William.  Chicago must be much better than NYC on the things that you mention.  In NYC landlords can discriminate against Section 8 and not a lot of them take it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/06/17/espadas-defection-hurts-more-than-just-the-dems/#comment-246547</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=13987#comment-246547</guid>
		<description>William - this would have closed a loophole, the vacancy decontrol loophole, the loophole right now means landlords can remove rent stabilization (and tenant eviction protections) from an apartment as soon as it is vacant.  In a rent stabilized apartment they can still raise rents, there are just controls on it.  Once it is not stabilized they can do what the fuck they want.  The bill would also have put stabilization back on some apartments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William &#8211; this would have closed a loophole, the vacancy decontrol loophole, the loophole right now means landlords can remove rent stabilization (and tenant eviction protections) from an apartment as soon as it is vacant.  In a rent stabilized apartment they can still raise rents, there are just controls on it.  Once it is not stabilized they can do what the fuck they want.  The bill would also have put stabilization back on some apartments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig R.</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/06/17/espadas-defection-hurts-more-than-just-the-dems/#comment-246531</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=13987#comment-246531</guid>
		<description>Boston used to have rent control, but it was phased out a long time ago.

I remember when I was in my first apartment, when rent control was starting to be phased out, that my landlord sent me a letter, in the middle of the lease term, that demanded a 150% increase in rent, right away.

And also demanded that I send them enough money to increase the amount of the security deposit to match the new rent they wanted to charge.

Now this didn&#039;t seem right to me, so I went to city hall and talked to some people who seemed terribly overworked.

They listened,  and (since it was apparently not an isolated incident) they had a packet already made up, under City letterhead, spelling out the *state* laws that govern, so that the landlord could not say that the city laws let him do what he was trying.

Of course,  it helped that I had a cousin who was working for the Mayor, so I didn&#039;t have to do a bureaucratic shuffle trying to find the right office.

Fast forward more than a few years, there is no effective rent control or stabilization in the city of Boston.  My mother, then a woman aged 89,on a fixed pension (and not a big one either) was informed that when her lease expired,  she would have to come up with triple the rent she had been paying for the last decade. And she had been in that apartment since at least 1973.

The children of the prior owner wanted to convert as many units to condos as they could.  And this was the way they saw to force people out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boston used to have rent control, but it was phased out a long time ago.</p>
<p>I remember when I was in my first apartment, when rent control was starting to be phased out, that my landlord sent me a letter, in the middle of the lease term, that demanded a 150% increase in rent, right away.</p>
<p>And also demanded that I send them enough money to increase the amount of the security deposit to match the new rent they wanted to charge.</p>
<p>Now this didn&#8217;t seem right to me, so I went to city hall and talked to some people who seemed terribly overworked.</p>
<p>They listened,  and (since it was apparently not an isolated incident) they had a packet already made up, under City letterhead, spelling out the *state* laws that govern, so that the landlord could not say that the city laws let him do what he was trying.</p>
<p>Of course,  it helped that I had a cousin who was working for the Mayor, so I didn&#8217;t have to do a bureaucratic shuffle trying to find the right office.</p>
<p>Fast forward more than a few years, there is no effective rent control or stabilization in the city of Boston.  My mother, then a woman aged 89,on a fixed pension (and not a big one either) was informed that when her lease expired,  she would have to come up with triple the rent she had been paying for the last decade. And she had been in that apartment since at least 1973.</p>
<p>The children of the prior owner wanted to convert as many units to condos as they could.  And this was the way they saw to force people out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.030 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 09:28:11 -->
