<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shall we tint our Twitter avatars?  No? Carry on&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/08/25/shall-we-tint-our-twitter-avatars-no-carry-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/08/25/shall-we-tint-our-twitter-avatars-no-carry-on/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:50:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Fatemeh</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/08/25/shall-we-tint-our-twitter-avatars-no-carry-on/#comment-271068</link>
		<dc:creator>Fatemeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=15598#comment-271068</guid>
		<description>This is a great post. KABOBfest asked what Afghanistan&#039;s election fraud &quot;protest&quot; color would be in a pointed attempt to illustrate the same issue: why did everyone care about Iran and not Afghanistan or Honduras?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post. KABOBfest asked what Afghanistan&#8217;s election fraud &#8220;protest&#8221; color would be in a pointed attempt to illustrate the same issue: why did everyone care about Iran and not Afghanistan or Honduras?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Jeffrey Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/08/25/shall-we-tint-our-twitter-avatars-no-carry-on/#comment-270966</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Jeffrey Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=15598#comment-270966</guid>
		<description>MIghty Pony Girl:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Iran is still happening — for God’s sake they just discovered a mass grave of 44 people suspected of being demonstrators. But the fad’s over, so we’re not hearing about it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Where? I missed the news of this one. Can you give a source? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MIghty Pony Girl:</p>
<blockquote><p>Iran is still happening — for God’s sake they just discovered a mass grave of 44 people suspected of being demonstrators. But the fad’s over, so we’re not hearing about it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Where? I missed the news of this one. Can you give a source? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sailorman</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/08/25/shall-we-tint-our-twitter-avatars-no-carry-on/#comment-270792</link>
		<dc:creator>Sailorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=15598#comment-270792</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Because funding mass murders and installing puppet dictators is really equatable with supporting actual democratic process and providing humanitarian aid.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Of course not.

But it is a lot easier to get entangled with another country&#039;s politics, residents, and future than it is to get DISentangled.  

So, why worry about entanglement?  Well, to make it more clear, you should try different language.  

&quot;Supporting democratic process&quot; is one way to put what we would be doing.  &quot;Openly assisting in the removal of a government&quot; is another way to put it, even though the current government was obtained through military coup.  And we both know which way it is going to be viewed by the current (in power) government.

We already get into trouble playing world policeman, even when we are trying to prevent fairly obvious issues like international wars of aggression.  When we step into a country&#039;s internal government, &lt;i&gt;especially&lt;/i&gt; when we are acting to try to completely change it, we risk setting a dangerous precedent.  

While I agree that Hondurans would benefit from a better government, and while I am also opposed to a variety of other pro-dictator U.S. intervention that is ongoing, I can see why we might not want to get into yet another fighting ring right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Because funding mass murders and installing puppet dictators is really equatable with supporting actual democratic process and providing humanitarian aid.</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course not.</p>
<p>But it is a lot easier to get entangled with another country&#8217;s politics, residents, and future than it is to get DISentangled.  </p>
<p>So, why worry about entanglement?  Well, to make it more clear, you should try different language.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Supporting democratic process&#8221; is one way to put what we would be doing.  &#8220;Openly assisting in the removal of a government&#8221; is another way to put it, even though the current government was obtained through military coup.  And we both know which way it is going to be viewed by the current (in power) government.</p>
<p>We already get into trouble playing world policeman, even when we are trying to prevent fairly obvious issues like international wars of aggression.  When we step into a country&#8217;s internal government, <i>especially</i> when we are acting to try to completely change it, we risk setting a dangerous precedent.  </p>
<p>While I agree that Hondurans would benefit from a better government, and while I am also opposed to a variety of other pro-dictator U.S. intervention that is ongoing, I can see why we might not want to get into yet another fighting ring right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cpinkhouse</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/08/25/shall-we-tint-our-twitter-avatars-no-carry-on/#comment-270755</link>
		<dc:creator>cpinkhouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=15598#comment-270755</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think there is any disputing the impropriety of the coup in Honduras. The whole of Latin America has more or less condemned it. 
One of the major issues is that Zelaya is seen by many as a power-hungry demagogue who was trying to illegally manipulate the constitution to promote his staying in power (i.e. abolishing term limits). 
I also wonder how much propaganda bombardment Hondurans are getting that distorts their reporting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there is any disputing the impropriety of the coup in Honduras. The whole of Latin America has more or less condemned it.<br />
One of the major issues is that Zelaya is seen by many as a power-hungry demagogue who was trying to illegally manipulate the constitution to promote his staying in power (i.e. abolishing term limits).<br />
I also wonder how much propaganda bombardment Hondurans are getting that distorts their reporting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niki</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/08/25/shall-we-tint-our-twitter-avatars-no-carry-on/#comment-270754</link>
		<dc:creator>Niki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=15598#comment-270754</guid>
		<description>*it must be &lt;i&gt;said&lt;/i&gt;, not sad. Although I admit that&#039;s a total Freudian slip!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*it must be <i>said</i>, not sad. Although I admit that&#8217;s a total Freudian slip!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niki</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/08/25/shall-we-tint-our-twitter-avatars-no-carry-on/#comment-270753</link>
		<dc:creator>Niki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=15598#comment-270753</guid>
		<description>To answer your question about non-US coverage, I&#039;m in Canada, and after reading your summation of the American coverage of Honduras, I can say the coverage here was pretty much the same. Iran was huge news, and Honduras was also a big deal but only for about a week. I can barely even remember the mention of the country in a newspaper here from July on. 

I think Mindy was bang-on in saying that Iran has a certain place in the average American (and Canadian) consciousness that isn&#039;t mirrored in our consciousness of Latin America. With the war in Afghanistan (widely participated in by many countries, including Canada--we have a really big role there), and the war in Iraq (admittedly pretty much just an American-British thing, but nonetheless very heavily covered by Canadian media), I think Westerners have a certain we-have-to-help-all-these-poor-middle-eastern-folk complex. A complex that is ethnocentric and sad, but very real. Whereas with Latin American countries, the public consciousness seems to say &quot;Well it&#039;s sad, but that&#039;s what poverty does.&quot; Kind of like the way we react to dictatorships and poverty in many African countries. The &quot;trendy&quot; place to do aid work and save people, today, does seem to be the middle east. It&#039;s quite a horrific state of affairs.

And--it must be sad--add to that the fact that the Honduras coup happened within days of MJ&#039;s death, and there you have it. I think we know which story of those two &quot;won&quot; the media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer your question about non-US coverage, I&#8217;m in Canada, and after reading your summation of the American coverage of Honduras, I can say the coverage here was pretty much the same. Iran was huge news, and Honduras was also a big deal but only for about a week. I can barely even remember the mention of the country in a newspaper here from July on. </p>
<p>I think Mindy was bang-on in saying that Iran has a certain place in the average American (and Canadian) consciousness that isn&#8217;t mirrored in our consciousness of Latin America. With the war in Afghanistan (widely participated in by many countries, including Canada&#8211;we have a really big role there), and the war in Iraq (admittedly pretty much just an American-British thing, but nonetheless very heavily covered by Canadian media), I think Westerners have a certain we-have-to-help-all-these-poor-middle-eastern-folk complex. A complex that is ethnocentric and sad, but very real. Whereas with Latin American countries, the public consciousness seems to say &#8220;Well it&#8217;s sad, but that&#8217;s what poverty does.&#8221; Kind of like the way we react to dictatorships and poverty in many African countries. The &#8220;trendy&#8221; place to do aid work and save people, today, does seem to be the middle east. It&#8217;s quite a horrific state of affairs.</p>
<p>And&#8211;it must be sad&#8211;add to that the fact that the Honduras coup happened within days of MJ&#8217;s death, and there you have it. I think we know which story of those two &#8220;won&#8221; the media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constintina</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/08/25/shall-we-tint-our-twitter-avatars-no-carry-on/#comment-270747</link>
		<dc:creator>Constintina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=15598#comment-270747</guid>
		<description>Richard:

Just briefly before I go to work (hope this isn&#039;t too pre-coffee incoherent):

&quot;There were demonstrations in this country–and in many other countries all over the world–against what was happening in Iran, and while they might not have been “huge” outpourings of grassroots support, they were also not insignificant, and they were not exclusively Iranian (at least not the ones that I went to). I guess I just don’t want the people at those protests to become invisible in your analysis.&quot;

Absolutely, and I don&#039;t mean to erase these people either, or imply that they are/were uncritical of the politics at play.  I&#039;m just trying to look at the support for Iranian protesters phenomenon (in the US specifically as that&#039;s what I&#039;m familiar with) and compare it other situations where things went differently, in this case Honduras, though there are countless examples we could use. 

&quot;Are you saying that situation in Honduras is different enough from the situation in Iran that Obama should take a different tack?&quot;

I&#039;m saying he &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; taking a different tack, on the PR if not policy level.  Though I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if some US body, if not the president himself, had either a hand in this or turned a blind eye.  I&#039;m not trying to float conspiracy theories, and I&#039;m not saying I believe that &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; the case  Just looking at the government&#039;s interests and history--it wouldn&#039;t &lt;i&gt;surprise&lt;/i&gt; me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard:</p>
<p>Just briefly before I go to work (hope this isn&#8217;t too pre-coffee incoherent):</p>
<p>&#8220;There were demonstrations in this country–and in many other countries all over the world–against what was happening in Iran, and while they might not have been “huge” outpourings of grassroots support, they were also not insignificant, and they were not exclusively Iranian (at least not the ones that I went to). I guess I just don’t want the people at those protests to become invisible in your analysis.&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely, and I don&#8217;t mean to erase these people either, or imply that they are/were uncritical of the politics at play.  I&#8217;m just trying to look at the support for Iranian protesters phenomenon (in the US specifically as that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m familiar with) and compare it other situations where things went differently, in this case Honduras, though there are countless examples we could use. </p>
<p>&#8220;Are you saying that situation in Honduras is different enough from the situation in Iran that Obama should take a different tack?&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m saying he <i>is</i> taking a different tack, on the PR if not policy level.  Though I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if some US body, if not the president himself, had either a hand in this or turned a blind eye.  I&#8217;m not trying to float conspiracy theories, and I&#8217;m not saying I believe that <i>is</i> the case  Just looking at the government&#8217;s interests and history&#8211;it wouldn&#8217;t <i>surprise</i> me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mighty Ponygirl</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/08/25/shall-we-tint-our-twitter-avatars-no-carry-on/#comment-270742</link>
		<dc:creator>Mighty Ponygirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=15598#comment-270742</guid>
		<description>The Turn Your Avatar Green thing was just a meme, something simple and easy to do so that you could feel like you were helping. If you REALLY wanted to step up to the plate and prove your bona fides and get behind the revolution, you&#039;d  post a photo of you holding up a piece of paper to cover your face with the words &quot;I am Neda&quot; on it. 

Iran is still happening -- for God&#039;s sake they just discovered a mass grave of 44 people suspected of being demonstrators. But the fad&#039;s over, so we&#039;re not hearing about it. 

The whole thing makes me pretty sick to my stomach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Turn Your Avatar Green thing was just a meme, something simple and easy to do so that you could feel like you were helping. If you REALLY wanted to step up to the plate and prove your bona fides and get behind the revolution, you&#8217;d  post a photo of you holding up a piece of paper to cover your face with the words &#8220;I am Neda&#8221; on it. </p>
<p>Iran is still happening &#8212; for God&#8217;s sake they just discovered a mass grave of 44 people suspected of being demonstrators. But the fad&#8217;s over, so we&#8217;re not hearing about it. </p>
<p>The whole thing makes me pretty sick to my stomach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/08/25/shall-we-tint-our-twitter-avatars-no-carry-on/#comment-270409</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=15598#comment-270409</guid>
		<description>I largely agree with what PTS said about Iran, but I think a central reason for the Western ambivalence in the case of Honduras is that - in defying the Supreme Court and attempting to stay in office beyond his constitutional term limit - Zelaya wasn&#039;t exactly te face of democracy either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I largely agree with what PTS said about Iran, but I think a central reason for the Western ambivalence in the case of Honduras is that &#8211; in defying the Supreme Court and attempting to stay in office beyond his constitutional term limit &#8211; Zelaya wasn&#8217;t exactly te face of democracy either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Banisteriopsis</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/08/25/shall-we-tint-our-twitter-avatars-no-carry-on/#comment-270405</link>
		<dc:creator>Banisteriopsis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=15598#comment-270405</guid>
		<description>Why would the US (strongly) oppose a coup? I just happened to be listening today to an issue of the Economist from when that happened. Wasn&#039;t Zelaya close to Chavez? We didn&#039;t really do much afterward to remove our financial support or diplomats. It seems to me the forcible removal of Zelaya would be in our interests. Oh, and btw what he was doing was sort of illegal, but that&#039;s a far far secondary consideration. Did the military ever give a reason for not hauling him before a judge right away?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would the US (strongly) oppose a coup? I just happened to be listening today to an issue of the Economist from when that happened. Wasn&#8217;t Zelaya close to Chavez? We didn&#8217;t really do much afterward to remove our financial support or diplomats. It seems to me the forcible removal of Zelaya would be in our interests. Oh, and btw what he was doing was sort of illegal, but that&#8217;s a far far secondary consideration. Did the military ever give a reason for not hauling him before a judge right away?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.030 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 08:08:10 -->
