<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hello, Class.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/09/20/hello-class/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/09/20/hello-class/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:12:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Cara</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/09/20/hello-class/#comment-276912</link>
		<dc:creator>Cara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=16776#comment-276912</guid>
		<description>Daisy -- when comments disappear, it means that the filter thought they were spam. I got yours out. No idea why it went there ... though my best guess from seeing real spam is the fact that the comment included a link alongside the words &quot;diet&quot; and &quot;botox&quot; :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daisy &#8212; when comments disappear, it means that the filter thought they were spam. I got yours out. No idea why it went there &#8230; though my best guess from seeing real spam is the fact that the comment included a link alongside the words &#8220;diet&#8221; and &#8220;botox&#8221; :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaisyDeadhead</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/09/20/hello-class/#comment-276908</link>
		<dc:creator>DaisyDeadhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=16776#comment-276908</guid>
		<description>Okay, my comment disappeared.  Did it go through?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, my comment disappeared.  Did it go through?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaisyDeadhead</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/09/20/hello-class/#comment-276906</link>
		<dc:creator>DaisyDeadhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=16776#comment-276906</guid>
		<description>The thing people are missing is the age component.  The &quot;research&quot; (using word advisedly) at HuffPo suggests women are unhappier AS WE AGE.  Probably because they will not stop fussing at us to look young, and have upped the ante.  Now we are expected to diet, use botox and collagen and look good forever.  This is impossible to achieve after a certain age without considerable anxiety and anguish.  Women in past generations were never expected to be &quot;matrons&quot; and look hot.

Still shocked that one of those nasty &quot;fashion&quot; TV-round-ups criticized Jessica Lange for showing her old-lady arms at the Emmys.  Never mind that she won!  (They didn&#039;t even fucking MENTION that!)  But they did mention her (likely) plastic surgery, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/abraham/detail??blogid=95&amp;entry_id=48021&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;while sneering that her arms still look bad. &lt;/a&gt; Jesus Christ, she&#039;s 64, has two Oscars... is there NO ESCAPE for ANYONE?  

No matter how well-achieved a woman is, no matter that she has had her faced stretched to the limit already, dammit, just &lt;i&gt;look at those ARMS!&lt;/i&gt;

Infuriating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing people are missing is the age component.  The &#8220;research&#8221; (using word advisedly) at HuffPo suggests women are unhappier AS WE AGE.  Probably because they will not stop fussing at us to look young, and have upped the ante.  Now we are expected to diet, use botox and collagen and look good forever.  This is impossible to achieve after a certain age without considerable anxiety and anguish.  Women in past generations were never expected to be &#8220;matrons&#8221; and look hot.</p>
<p>Still shocked that one of those nasty &#8220;fashion&#8221; TV-round-ups criticized Jessica Lange for showing her old-lady arms at the Emmys.  Never mind that she won!  (They didn&#8217;t even fucking MENTION that!)  But they did mention her (likely) plastic surgery, <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/abraham/detail??blogid=95&amp;entry_id=48021" rel="nofollow">while sneering that her arms still look bad. </a> Jesus Christ, she&#8217;s 64, has two Oscars&#8230; is there NO ESCAPE for ANYONE?  </p>
<p>No matter how well-achieved a woman is, no matter that she has had her faced stretched to the limit already, dammit, just <i>look at those ARMS!</i></p>
<p>Infuriating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Echidne of the snakes</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/09/20/hello-class/#comment-276828</link>
		<dc:creator>Echidne of the snakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=16776#comment-276828</guid>
		<description>I cannot resist linking to my post on this topic, sort of. &lt;a href=&quot;http://echidneofthesnakes.blogspot.com/2009_09_01_archive.html#4219230311369285050&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Little Game&lt;/a&gt;.

The thing is that feminism is always the culprit!  It&#039;s truly miraculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot resist linking to my post on this topic, sort of. <a href="http://echidneofthesnakes.blogspot.com/2009_09_01_archive.html#4219230311369285050" rel="nofollow">A Little Game</a>.</p>
<p>The thing is that feminism is always the culprit!  It&#8217;s truly miraculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eghead</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/09/20/hello-class/#comment-276821</link>
		<dc:creator>Eghead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=16776#comment-276821</guid>
		<description>On principle, I prefer not to discuss anything relating to Maureen Dowd, because (IMHO, of course) she&#039;s a hack who has done absolutely nothing worthwhile for the liberal movement.  However, since this prompt is a no-brainer, I&#039;ll get my commenting on.

1) The more rights you have, the easier it is to ask for even more.  As in, there is less of a chance you will be laughed off the stage or, you know, verbally or physically attacked.  

2) Feminism is about women, not men.  So I don&#039;t really care how the &#039;revolution&#039; has affected men except in relation to how said men now affect women.  Whether or not they&#039;ve progressed more than women does not concern me in the least.  If, however, we&#039;re discussing how men&#039;s rights relative to women&#039;s actually impact women&#039;s lives... then I could give you more than a non-answer.  In short, wrong question, Maureen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On principle, I prefer not to discuss anything relating to Maureen Dowd, because (IMHO, of course) she&#8217;s a hack who has done absolutely nothing worthwhile for the liberal movement.  However, since this prompt is a no-brainer, I&#8217;ll get my commenting on.</p>
<p>1) The more rights you have, the easier it is to ask for even more.  As in, there is less of a chance you will be laughed off the stage or, you know, verbally or physically attacked.  </p>
<p>2) Feminism is about women, not men.  So I don&#8217;t really care how the &#8216;revolution&#8217; has affected men except in relation to how said men now affect women.  Whether or not they&#8217;ve progressed more than women does not concern me in the least.  If, however, we&#8217;re discussing how men&#8217;s rights relative to women&#8217;s actually impact women&#8217;s lives&#8230; then I could give you more than a non-answer.  In short, wrong question, Maureen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozymandias</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/09/20/hello-class/#comment-276749</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozymandias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=16776#comment-276749</guid>
		<description>Better to be a Socrates dissatisfied than a pig satisfied. Better to be free and unhappy than happy in chains.

Besides, is there any reason why feminism shouldn&#039;t benefit men in addition to women? Seems like we were (and are) all imprisoned by rigid gender roles, and patriarchy hurts men too.

Anyway, this entire point is moot, because correlation does NOT equal causation and there&#039;s lots of reasons for women to become slightly less happy that have nothing to do with feminism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better to be a Socrates dissatisfied than a pig satisfied. Better to be free and unhappy than happy in chains.</p>
<p>Besides, is there any reason why feminism shouldn&#8217;t benefit men in addition to women? Seems like we were (and are) all imprisoned by rigid gender roles, and patriarchy hurts men too.</p>
<p>Anyway, this entire point is moot, because correlation does NOT equal causation and there&#8217;s lots of reasons for women to become slightly less happy that have nothing to do with feminism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faith from F.N.</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/09/20/hello-class/#comment-276660</link>
		<dc:creator>Faith from F.N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=16776#comment-276660</guid>
		<description>&quot;Maureen Dowd writes lesbians out of this column – with all her marriage, men/women, household chores centering. We exist, Maureen! And could we (gasp) be happier than straight women? I would like to see a research study on that!&quot;

She&#039;s also leaving out single women/mothers. While I might be saddled with the housework simply because I refuse to allow a man into my home, I am quite happy just because of the fact that I can make the choice to not allow a man into my home and to have the luxury of living a life independent of a man. 

Yes, I get pissed off about the state of world. But that fact has nothing to do with feminism. That fact has to do with society&#039;s constant refusal to treat women of any class or race as fully human. Feminism has absolutely nothing to do with why I&#039;m so often full of anger and frustration. Patriarchal society, which is exactly what feminists are trying to fight, is what makes me livid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Maureen Dowd writes lesbians out of this column – with all her marriage, men/women, household chores centering. We exist, Maureen! And could we (gasp) be happier than straight women? I would like to see a research study on that!&#8221;</p>
<p>She&#8217;s also leaving out single women/mothers. While I might be saddled with the housework simply because I refuse to allow a man into my home, I am quite happy just because of the fact that I can make the choice to not allow a man into my home and to have the luxury of living a life independent of a man. </p>
<p>Yes, I get pissed off about the state of world. But that fact has nothing to do with feminism. That fact has to do with society&#8217;s constant refusal to treat women of any class or race as fully human. Feminism has absolutely nothing to do with why I&#8217;m so often full of anger and frustration. Patriarchal society, which is exactly what feminists are trying to fight, is what makes me livid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LN80</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/09/20/hello-class/#comment-276649</link>
		<dc:creator>LN80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=16776#comment-276649</guid>
		<description>Maureen Dowd writes lesbians out of this column - with all her marriage, men/women, household chores centering.  We exist, Maureen!  And could we (gasp) be happier than straight women?  I would like to see a research study on that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maureen Dowd writes lesbians out of this column &#8211; with all her marriage, men/women, household chores centering.  We exist, Maureen!  And could we (gasp) be happier than straight women?  I would like to see a research study on that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Catgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/09/20/hello-class/#comment-276638</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Catgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=16776#comment-276638</guid>
		<description>Two not-so-secrets of the universe that far too many women fail to learn/accept.
1.	There will always be a dozen fires burning out of control in your life - Focus on what is truly important and let the rest burn.
2.	If people/society toss bullshit at you, throw it right back

My mother and a couple of my &quot;uncles&quot; are masters of those rules. My parents might of showed up a total of 2 times to &quot;parent/teacher&quot; events, my third grade teacher use to ask me if I even had a mother, she wanted to talk to her about something, mum kept blowing her off.  
It is the &quot;Why&quot; that is important, mother knew if she *allowed* herself to be caught up in school drama, she would be even more over extended than she was, and end up miserable. 

When I got older, like 12, I was in charge of house cleaning, if it got  too much for me, the &#039;rents would hire a cleaning service that I&#039;d supervise.  I took over mother&#039;s garden too, as she is ummm close to retirement age.

Both my parents are professionals, they make good money, why should mum and dad work 50+ hours , often on odd schedules, AND keep up the house, when they could &quot;offload&quot; it.

Entertaining, Americans are rather silly; they entertain in their homes, we entertain out most of the time, when we did have open houses, they were catered and the cleaning service showed up the next day.

Granted it is a professional+ class existence, but that is who  Dowd is talking about in her article.

Contrast this to my SO&#039;s mother, who is middle class and has a  40 hour J-O-B,  3 grown children she frets about incessantly , a traditional husband who doesn&#039;t do squat around the house, etc.  She cooks, cleans, did the school thing, active in her church, bleh bleh bleh. Of course, she is a miserable human being; she is a mistress of what does not matter.

Women need to drop the second shift, and stop getting involved in community affairs. If those things are truly important,the guys/powers-that-be will pick up the slack, making them weaker and women stronger. Or we will be watching what&#039;s left of pathetic 1950esq society burn to the ground, I&#039;ll bring marshmallows =(^ . ^ )=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two not-so-secrets of the universe that far too many women fail to learn/accept.<br />
1.	There will always be a dozen fires burning out of control in your life &#8211; Focus on what is truly important and let the rest burn.<br />
2.	If people/society toss bullshit at you, throw it right back</p>
<p>My mother and a couple of my &#8220;uncles&#8221; are masters of those rules. My parents might of showed up a total of 2 times to &#8220;parent/teacher&#8221; events, my third grade teacher use to ask me if I even had a mother, she wanted to talk to her about something, mum kept blowing her off.<br />
It is the &#8220;Why&#8221; that is important, mother knew if she *allowed* herself to be caught up in school drama, she would be even more over extended than she was, and end up miserable. </p>
<p>When I got older, like 12, I was in charge of house cleaning, if it got  too much for me, the &#8216;rents would hire a cleaning service that I&#8217;d supervise.  I took over mother&#8217;s garden too, as she is ummm close to retirement age.</p>
<p>Both my parents are professionals, they make good money, why should mum and dad work 50+ hours , often on odd schedules, AND keep up the house, when they could &#8220;offload&#8221; it.</p>
<p>Entertaining, Americans are rather silly; they entertain in their homes, we entertain out most of the time, when we did have open houses, they were catered and the cleaning service showed up the next day.</p>
<p>Granted it is a professional+ class existence, but that is who  Dowd is talking about in her article.</p>
<p>Contrast this to my SO&#8217;s mother, who is middle class and has a  40 hour J-O-B,  3 grown children she frets about incessantly , a traditional husband who doesn&#8217;t do squat around the house, etc.  She cooks, cleans, did the school thing, active in her church, bleh bleh bleh. Of course, she is a miserable human being; she is a mistress of what does not matter.</p>
<p>Women need to drop the second shift, and stop getting involved in community affairs. If those things are truly important,the guys/powers-that-be will pick up the slack, making them weaker and women stronger. Or we will be watching what&#8217;s left of pathetic 1950esq society burn to the ground, I&#8217;ll bring marshmallows =(^ . ^ )=</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristen J.</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/09/20/hello-class/#comment-276621</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=16776#comment-276621</guid>
		<description>In 1970, how many DV shelters were there?  In how many states was marital rape legal?  In how many states could women obtain a no-fault divorce?  How many women completed high school, college, or graduate school?  Hell, how many women knew how their bodies functioned?

As for the home disparity...In 1970, how many men volunteered to be SAHD?  How many men knew how to wash their own clothes or operate a vacuum cleaner?  How many men did the grocery shopping?  I wouldn&#039;t presume to argue that anything is fair.  Clearly, we&#039;re in a cultural transition phase, but there are quite a few of us who have egalitarian relationships with men in and out of marriage.  How many do you think there were in 1970?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1970, how many DV shelters were there?  In how many states was marital rape legal?  In how many states could women obtain a no-fault divorce?  How many women completed high school, college, or graduate school?  Hell, how many women knew how their bodies functioned?</p>
<p>As for the home disparity&#8230;In 1970, how many men volunteered to be SAHD?  How many men knew how to wash their own clothes or operate a vacuum cleaner?  How many men did the grocery shopping?  I wouldn&#8217;t presume to argue that anything is fair.  Clearly, we&#8217;re in a cultural transition phase, but there are quite a few of us who have egalitarian relationships with men in and out of marriage.  How many do you think there were in 1970?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.030 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 01:22:11 -->
