National Women’s History Museum bill moves to the Senate

This is pretty cool. The House of Representatives recently passed a bipartisan bill (HR 1700) that would set the stage for a National Women’s History Museum to be built on the National Mall. It now moves to the Senate. The House passed HR 1700 on a voice vote, and in previous years similar legislation died there, so I dare to be optimistic about this bill’s chances in the Senate.

From the National Women’s History Museum website:

This bipartisan bill (H.R. 1700), re-introduced by Representative Carolyn B. Maloney (D-NY), will allow NWHM to purchase – at fair market value – land next to the National Mall and build the first major repository of women’s accomplishments and contributions in Washington, D.C. The Senate companion bill will be re-introduced by Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) shortly.

The sale of this land involves federal property and must be approved by Congress.

The National Women’s History Museum Act offers a viable opportunity for NWHM to secure a permanent physical space to house the collections that it plans to make public and further its educational services. The new location at 12th Street SW and Independence Avenue SW is across the street from several of the nation’s most iconic museums, such as the National Air and Space Museum, the National American History Museum and the National Gallery of Art. It’s the right place for a comprehensive museum on women’s accomplishments.

Author: has written 62 posts for this blog.

Return to: Homepage | Blog Index

2 Responses

  1. Shiyiya
    Shiyiya October 28, 2009 at 11:08 pm |

    *emails both her senators asking them to support it*

    Not that I’m hugely hopeful, what with them voting against the Franken bill and all, but it can’t hurt to try…

  2. Stuff We Missed « Equal Writes
    Stuff We Missed « Equal Writes November 9, 2009 at 11:15 pm |

    […] National Women’s History Museum bill moved to the Senate today.  Wouldn’t that be […]

Comments are closed.

The commenting period has expired for this post. If you wish to re-open the discussion, please do so in the latest Open Thread.