<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Levi Johnston Is Too Hairy and Hideous To Be Objectified</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/11/24/levi-johnston-is-too-hairy-and-hideous-to-be-objectified/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/11/24/levi-johnston-is-too-hairy-and-hideous-to-be-objectified/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:14:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalia</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/11/24/levi-johnston-is-too-hairy-and-hideous-to-be-objectified/#comment-288159</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17163#comment-288159</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Okay, but can we all at least agree that, universally, not having a head is definitely going to make you less beautiful? ;-)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But when it comes to men, which head are we talking about? ;)

(OK, I&#039;ll stop)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Okay, but can we all at least agree that, universally, not having a head is definitely going to make you less beautiful? ;-)</p></blockquote>
<p>But when it comes to men, which head are we talking about? ;)</p>
<p>(OK, I&#8217;ll stop)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/11/24/levi-johnston-is-too-hairy-and-hideous-to-be-objectified/#comment-288154</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 03:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17163#comment-288154</guid>
		<description>Okay, but can we all at least agree that, universally, not having a head is definitely going to make you less beautiful? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, but can we all at least agree that, universally, not having a head is definitely going to make you less beautiful? ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalia</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/11/24/levi-johnston-is-too-hairy-and-hideous-to-be-objectified/#comment-288148</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17163#comment-288148</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We have, in fact, become much more laid back&lt;/blockquote&gt;

We have?!?!

&lt;blockquote&gt;You can’t speak about ” flesh and blood vessels” and ignore the flesh and blood realities of what one’s fun, sexay, to be defended vigorously judgments do to people.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I couldn&#039;t ignore the realities if I tried - considering the fact that I also live them. But  I blame that on the fact that I don&#039;t think society, American society in particular, is at all laid back. I think that&#039;s a facade. It&#039;s kind of like, if you look at the covers of American magazines, you might think that the United States is pretty liberal when it comes to sex... when it isn&#039;t that liberal at all, actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We have, in fact, become much more laid back</p></blockquote>
<p>We have?!?!</p>
<blockquote><p>You can’t speak about ” flesh and blood vessels” and ignore the flesh and blood realities of what one’s fun, sexay, to be defended vigorously judgments do to people.</p></blockquote>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t ignore the realities if I tried &#8211; considering the fact that I also live them. But  I blame that on the fact that I don&#8217;t think society, American society in particular, is at all laid back. I think that&#8217;s a facade. It&#8217;s kind of like, if you look at the covers of American magazines, you might think that the United States is pretty liberal when it comes to sex&#8230; when it isn&#8217;t that liberal at all, actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smmo</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/11/24/levi-johnston-is-too-hairy-and-hideous-to-be-objectified/#comment-288141</link>
		<dc:creator>smmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17163#comment-288141</guid>
		<description>Andrea said &lt;i&gt;And let’s not forget that all of those cultivated beauty rituals were just a way for a literally useless 18th century aristocracy to distinguish itself from the lower classes who didn’t have access. It may have been less sexist, but it couldn’t get any more classist.&lt;/i&gt;

But oh! so! fun!  (eyeroll) Until the heads came off that is.  

Natalia said &lt;i&gt;Right now, the impact of judgment on women is pretty disastrous, for example. But I think that if people we’re a little bit more laid back and a whole lot less sexist, it wouldn’t be nearly as much of a problem.&lt;/i&gt;

We are very far away from this.  I think especially young people feel that their sexual attractiveness is quite literally a survival skill, which is of course utter bullshit (gives the finger to ev psych people on general principle) but feels real.  You can&#039;t speak about &quot; flesh and blood vessels&quot; and ignore the flesh and blood realities of what one&#039;s fun, sexay, to be defended vigorously judgments do to people.  We have, in fact, become much more laid back and body judgment has become worse.  Time for a different solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea said <i>And let’s not forget that all of those cultivated beauty rituals were just a way for a literally useless 18th century aristocracy to distinguish itself from the lower classes who didn’t have access. It may have been less sexist, but it couldn’t get any more classist.</i></p>
<p>But oh! so! fun!  (eyeroll) Until the heads came off that is.  </p>
<p>Natalia said <i>Right now, the impact of judgment on women is pretty disastrous, for example. But I think that if people we’re a little bit more laid back and a whole lot less sexist, it wouldn’t be nearly as much of a problem.</i></p>
<p>We are very far away from this.  I think especially young people feel that their sexual attractiveness is quite literally a survival skill, which is of course utter bullshit (gives the finger to ev psych people on general principle) but feels real.  You can&#8217;t speak about &#8221; flesh and blood vessels&#8221; and ignore the flesh and blood realities of what one&#8217;s fun, sexay, to be defended vigorously judgments do to people.  We have, in fact, become much more laid back and body judgment has become worse.  Time for a different solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q Grrl</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/11/24/levi-johnston-is-too-hairy-and-hideous-to-be-objectified/#comment-288094</link>
		<dc:creator>Q Grrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17163#comment-288094</guid>
		<description>My take on it is that desire = something I personally feel towards another human being.  Its counterpart is repulsion.  I am capable of feeling both, for many reasons.

Objectification, however, is when I expect another human being to actually *be* my desire/repulsion (and especially that immature part where I get nasty when the other human being remains the human being they always were and not just the desire/repulsion mantra I wish they would be).

As far as feminism and judgment goes, I still think it&#039;s early days for feminism and that many women do not know how to adequately judge the risks and benefits of heterosexuality (as practiced in a patriarchy/rape culture).  I personally think it is less of a slippery slope for women to apply outdated/improper standards of objectification than it is for women to fumble through a compulsory heterosexuality that starts at the premise that women = the sexual desires of men.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My take on it is that desire = something I personally feel towards another human being.  Its counterpart is repulsion.  I am capable of feeling both, for many reasons.</p>
<p>Objectification, however, is when I expect another human being to actually *be* my desire/repulsion (and especially that immature part where I get nasty when the other human being remains the human being they always were and not just the desire/repulsion mantra I wish they would be).</p>
<p>As far as feminism and judgment goes, I still think it&#8217;s early days for feminism and that many women do not know how to adequately judge the risks and benefits of heterosexuality (as practiced in a patriarchy/rape culture).  I personally think it is less of a slippery slope for women to apply outdated/improper standards of objectification than it is for women to fumble through a compulsory heterosexuality that starts at the premise that women = the sexual desires of men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalia</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/11/24/levi-johnston-is-too-hairy-and-hideous-to-be-objectified/#comment-288086</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17163#comment-288086</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not arguing for acceptance. I&#039;m arguing for sanity. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not arguing for acceptance. I&#8217;m arguing for sanity. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hikikomori</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/11/24/levi-johnston-is-too-hairy-and-hideous-to-be-objectified/#comment-288054</link>
		<dc:creator>Hikikomori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17163#comment-288054</guid>
		<description>Is &quot;I (don&#039;t) find x attractive because... &quot; a judgment? If it is a judgment, is it even possible to not judge?

What i find attractive is probably influenced by movies, magazines, comics... If i talk about it, do i perpetuate existing beauty standards?

Maybe, but so do moviegoers, magazine readers, comic fans...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is &#8220;I (don&#8217;t) find x attractive because&#8230; &#8221; a judgment? If it is a judgment, is it even possible to not judge?</p>
<p>What i find attractive is probably influenced by movies, magazines, comics&#8230; If i talk about it, do i perpetuate existing beauty standards?</p>
<p>Maybe, but so do moviegoers, magazine readers, comic fans&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/11/24/levi-johnston-is-too-hairy-and-hideous-to-be-objectified/#comment-287997</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17163#comment-287997</guid>
		<description>Given the fact that the very definition of &quot;judgment&quot; is &quot;this is right, that is wrong&quot; or &quot;this is better, that is worse&quot; I&#039;d have to disagree.  The impact of judgment on men is getting increasingly worse, with the rate of eating disorders increasing etc.  Judgment never means acceptance, I&#039;m afraid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the fact that the very definition of &#8220;judgment&#8221; is &#8220;this is right, that is wrong&#8221; or &#8220;this is better, that is worse&#8221; I&#8217;d have to disagree.  The impact of judgment on men is getting increasingly worse, with the rate of eating disorders increasing etc.  Judgment never means acceptance, I&#8217;m afraid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalia</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/11/24/levi-johnston-is-too-hairy-and-hideous-to-be-objectified/#comment-287996</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17163#comment-287996</guid>
		<description>Faith, but that depends on the impact of the judgment, no? Right now, the impact of judgment on women is pretty disastrous, for example. But I think that if people we&#039;re a little bit more laid back and a whole lot less sexist, it wouldn&#039;t be nearly as much of a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faith, but that depends on the impact of the judgment, no? Right now, the impact of judgment on women is pretty disastrous, for example. But I think that if people we&#8217;re a little bit more laid back and a whole lot less sexist, it wouldn&#8217;t be nearly as much of a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sady</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2009/11/24/levi-johnston-is-too-hairy-and-hideous-to-be-objectified/#comment-287970</link>
		<dc:creator>Sady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17163#comment-287970</guid>
		<description>Dear Comment Thread, 

I love you. 

Signed, 

Sady.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Comment Thread, </p>
<p>I love you. </p>
<p>Signed, </p>
<p>Sady.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.036 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 08:47:17 -->
