<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shameless Self-Promotion Sunday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/02/07/shameless-self-promotion-sunday-132/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/02/07/shameless-self-promotion-sunday-132/</link>
	<description>In defense of the sanctimonious women&#039;s studies set.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:11:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: aiblee</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/02/07/shameless-self-promotion-sunday-132/#comment-293989</link>
		<dc:creator>aiblee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17451#comment-293989</guid>
		<description>This week I started CBShe, a brand new blog with a focus on feminist news and analysis from a Canadian perspective. I have only been around for a few days, but I have a &lt;a href=&quot;http://cbshe.wordpress.com/2010/02/13/sisters-in-spirit-could-lose-funding/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post on the potential that Sisters in Spirit,&lt;/a&gt; a NWAC initiative working address violence against Aboriginal women, will lose their federal funding. &lt;a href=&quot;http://cbshe.wordpress.com/2010/02/11/83/#more-83&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This post&lt;/a&gt; looks at CBC&#039;s approach to unique challenges faced by women when preparing for retirement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week I started CBShe, a brand new blog with a focus on feminist news and analysis from a Canadian perspective. I have only been around for a few days, but I have a <a href="http://cbshe.wordpress.com/2010/02/13/sisters-in-spirit-could-lose-funding/" rel="nofollow">post on the potential that Sisters in Spirit,</a> a NWAC initiative working address violence against Aboriginal women, will lose their federal funding. <a href="http://cbshe.wordpress.com/2010/02/11/83/#more-83" rel="nofollow">This post</a> looks at CBC&#8217;s approach to unique challenges faced by women when preparing for retirement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sailorman</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/02/07/shameless-self-promotion-sunday-132/#comment-293437</link>
		<dc:creator>Sailorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17451#comment-293437</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Figleaf&lt;/b&gt;
Your interesting post is simply a larger example of the very problematic question:  How do you simultaneously

(1) Use rational actions and probability to target members of a group when the group members are statistically more likely to do something; and

(2) Avoid targeting people based on immutable characteristics; i.e. avoid discriminating and stereotyping?  (Note that I am in no way complaining about targeting group membership based on MUTABLE characteristics; you can stereotype all you want against liberals, conservatives, etc.)

I frankly think that&#039;s a discussion which is arguably best had in the general.  The reason for my belief is that when the issue comes up, it&#039;s inevitably in a context where someone is arguing, hard, for special pleading.  So instead of following the general rule &quot;don&#039;t discriminate based on immutable characteristics!&quot; we end up doing so most of the time, and focusing on the few areas where things presumably AREN&#039;T appropriate to discriminate.  That&#039;s not an especially good model if the goal is &quot;don&#039;t discriminate.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Figleaf</b><br />
Your interesting post is simply a larger example of the very problematic question:  How do you simultaneously</p>
<p>(1) Use rational actions and probability to target members of a group when the group members are statistically more likely to do something; and</p>
<p>(2) Avoid targeting people based on immutable characteristics; i.e. avoid discriminating and stereotyping?  (Note that I am in no way complaining about targeting group membership based on MUTABLE characteristics; you can stereotype all you want against liberals, conservatives, etc.)</p>
<p>I frankly think that&#8217;s a discussion which is arguably best had in the general.  The reason for my belief is that when the issue comes up, it&#8217;s inevitably in a context where someone is arguing, hard, for special pleading.  So instead of following the general rule &#8220;don&#8217;t discriminate based on immutable characteristics!&#8221; we end up doing so most of the time, and focusing on the few areas where things presumably AREN&#8217;T appropriate to discriminate.  That&#8217;s not an especially good model if the goal is &#8220;don&#8217;t discriminate.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figleaf</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/02/07/shameless-self-promotion-sunday-132/#comment-293433</link>
		<dc:creator>figleaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17451#comment-293433</guid>
		<description>For some reason almost all my posts this week were about sexual pressure and gender assumptions.  It&#039;s really, really tricking talking about men and sexual assault when the world is so full of both apologists and... I dunno, whatever the opposite might be.

Anyway, still trying to figure out how to have the conversation, with men especially, without it getting immediately shutdown is pretty imporant.  Which is why I&#039;m not completely happy with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realadultsex.com/archives/2010/02/restating-contentious-assertion-woman-any-man-could-potentially-be-rapist&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Restating a Contentious Assertion: To a Woman, Any Man Could Potentially Be a Rapist&lt;/a&gt;, but feel like it&#039;s a good start.  My big realization there is that there&#039;s a very strong, almost mechanical social reflex for rejecting assertions of the form &quot;all X&#039;s are Y&#039;s&quot; because it sounds like stereotyping.  So that post is about trying to say the same thing without falling into stereotyping defenses, or defenses of stereotyping.

There&#039;s another, more conventionally pernicious side to stereotype-style assertions like &quot;all men are potential rapists:&quot; the dominant paradigm conditions men to &lt;em&gt;expect&lt;/em&gt; to be utterly mistrusted, with the result that we believe &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; sexual, romantic, or even non-initiate conversations with women must begin with attempts to demonstrate we&#039;re worthy and &quot;not like every other guy.&quot;  I talk about that paradox here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realadultsex.com/archives/2010/02/two-rules-desire-problem-not-restating-all-men-are-potential-rapists&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Two Rules of Desire As a Problem With Not Restating &quot;All Men Are Potential Rapists&quot;&lt;/a&gt;

In the middle of all that I stumbled across a post by Amanda Hess about rapper Lil Wayne who disclosed that he was raped as a child and... had a hard time getting it through people&#039;s thick skulls (cough Jimmy Kimmel cough) that no, it wasn&#039;t fun, it wasn&#039;t cool, and it &lt;em&gt;was&lt;/em&gt; rape.  I talk about that in the context of my own childhood experiences with sexual assault &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realadultsex.com/archives/2010/02/lil-wayne-and-problem-confusing-sexual-assault-victims-male-sexual-role-models&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lil Wayne and the Problem of Confusing Sexual Assault Victims With Male Sexual Role Models&lt;/a&gt;.  One big realization that came out of that, by the way, is that thanks to the pressures of a highly-gendered society trauma of assault manifests, and is manifested up, girls and boys in very different, but no-less problematic ways.

And finally, I came across the anonymous blogger &quot;Harriet Jacobs&quot; of &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://fugitivus.wordpress.com/2009/10/28/harriets-sordid-past/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fugitivus&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;  Some of what she writes is harrowing but wow does what she have to say about bottom-out-of-sight dropout/stoner/petty-criminal/rapist/loser culture!  Which I came so close to disappearing into myself.  I talk about it in a couple of posts but most personally here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realadultsex.com/archives/2010/02/harriet-jacobs-fugitivus-writes-awesomely-about-coping-abuse-all-its-permutations&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Harriet Jacobs at Fugitivus Writes Awesomely About Coping With Abuse in All It&#039;s Permutations&lt;/a&gt;

One good thing about reading Harriet Jacobs is I finally got a link about privilege that had always eluded me.  Because, of course, even though it&#039;s obvious as a lemon-juice in a paper cut to people who don&#039;t have it, privilege is invisible to the privileged.  So now I&#039;m thinking about ways to make it less invisible to those of us who need to see it the most.

figleaf

p.s. did anyone else get the impression that that pro-misinformation, anti-abortion ad in the Superbowl wasn&#039;t anywhere near the most offensive one?  I mean WTF is up with advertisers this year!?!?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason almost all my posts this week were about sexual pressure and gender assumptions.  It&#8217;s really, really tricking talking about men and sexual assault when the world is so full of both apologists and&#8230; I dunno, whatever the opposite might be.</p>
<p>Anyway, still trying to figure out how to have the conversation, with men especially, without it getting immediately shutdown is pretty imporant.  Which is why I&#8217;m not completely happy with <a href="http://www.realadultsex.com/archives/2010/02/restating-contentious-assertion-woman-any-man-could-potentially-be-rapist" rel="nofollow">Restating a Contentious Assertion: To a Woman, Any Man Could Potentially Be a Rapist</a>, but feel like it&#8217;s a good start.  My big realization there is that there&#8217;s a very strong, almost mechanical social reflex for rejecting assertions of the form &#8220;all X&#8217;s are Y&#8217;s&#8221; because it sounds like stereotyping.  So that post is about trying to say the same thing without falling into stereotyping defenses, or defenses of stereotyping.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s another, more conventionally pernicious side to stereotype-style assertions like &#8220;all men are potential rapists:&#8221; the dominant paradigm conditions men to <em>expect</em> to be utterly mistrusted, with the result that we believe <em>all</em> sexual, romantic, or even non-initiate conversations with women must begin with attempts to demonstrate we&#8217;re worthy and &#8220;not like every other guy.&#8221;  I talk about that paradox here: <a href="http://www.realadultsex.com/archives/2010/02/two-rules-desire-problem-not-restating-all-men-are-potential-rapists" rel="nofollow">The Two Rules of Desire As a Problem With Not Restating &#8220;All Men Are Potential Rapists&#8221;</a></p>
<p>In the middle of all that I stumbled across a post by Amanda Hess about rapper Lil Wayne who disclosed that he was raped as a child and&#8230; had a hard time getting it through people&#8217;s thick skulls (cough Jimmy Kimmel cough) that no, it wasn&#8217;t fun, it wasn&#8217;t cool, and it <em>was</em> rape.  I talk about that in the context of my own childhood experiences with sexual assault <a href="http://www.realadultsex.com/archives/2010/02/lil-wayne-and-problem-confusing-sexual-assault-victims-male-sexual-role-models" rel="nofollow">Lil Wayne and the Problem of Confusing Sexual Assault Victims With Male Sexual Role Models</a>.  One big realization that came out of that, by the way, is that thanks to the pressures of a highly-gendered society trauma of assault manifests, and is manifested up, girls and boys in very different, but no-less problematic ways.</p>
<p>And finally, I came across the anonymous blogger &#8220;Harriet Jacobs&#8221; of &#8220;<a href="http://fugitivus.wordpress.com/2009/10/28/harriets-sordid-past/" rel="nofollow">Fugitivus</a>.&#8221;  Some of what she writes is harrowing but wow does what she have to say about bottom-out-of-sight dropout/stoner/petty-criminal/rapist/loser culture!  Which I came so close to disappearing into myself.  I talk about it in a couple of posts but most personally here: <a href="http://www.realadultsex.com/archives/2010/02/harriet-jacobs-fugitivus-writes-awesomely-about-coping-abuse-all-its-permutations" rel="nofollow">Harriet Jacobs at Fugitivus Writes Awesomely About Coping With Abuse in All It&#8217;s Permutations</a></p>
<p>One good thing about reading Harriet Jacobs is I finally got a link about privilege that had always eluded me.  Because, of course, even though it&#8217;s obvious as a lemon-juice in a paper cut to people who don&#8217;t have it, privilege is invisible to the privileged.  So now I&#8217;m thinking about ways to make it less invisible to those of us who need to see it the most.</p>
<p>figleaf</p>
<p>p.s. did anyone else get the impression that that pro-misinformation, anti-abortion ad in the Superbowl wasn&#8217;t anywhere near the most offensive one?  I mean WTF is up with advertisers this year!?!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cold SnapDragon</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/02/07/shameless-self-promotion-sunday-132/#comment-293432</link>
		<dc:creator>Cold SnapDragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17451#comment-293432</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://coldsnapdragon.blogspot.com/2010/02/foetus-at-par-with-minor-child.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Court ruling: Foetus at par with a Minor Child&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://coldsnapdragon.blogspot.com/2010/02/mansplaining.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Another mansplaining rant&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://coldsnapdragon.blogspot.com/2010/02/foetus-at-par-with-minor-child.html" rel="nofollow">Court ruling: Foetus at par with a Minor Child</a></p>
<p><a href="http://coldsnapdragon.blogspot.com/2010/02/mansplaining.html" rel="nofollow">Another mansplaining rant</a><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/02/07/shameless-self-promotion-sunday-132/#comment-293430</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17451#comment-293430</guid>
		<description>Elizabeth and Julia take on &lt;a href=&quot;http://ofheartandmind.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/super-bowl-xliv-mans-last-stand/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sexism and the Super Bowl &lt;/a&gt; in &lt;a href=&quot;http://ofheartandmind.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/if-they-dont-have-the-guts-i-call-them-girlie-men/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; two &lt;/a&gt; posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth and Julia take on <a href="http://ofheartandmind.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/super-bowl-xliv-mans-last-stand/" rel="nofollow">Sexism and the Super Bowl </a> in <a href="http://ofheartandmind.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/if-they-dont-have-the-guts-i-call-them-girlie-men/" rel="nofollow"> two </a> posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifurret</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/02/07/shameless-self-promotion-sunday-132/#comment-293428</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifurret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17451#comment-293428</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blaghag.com/2010/02/10-most-sexist-super-bowl-ads.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; 10 Most Sexist Super Bowl Ads&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.blaghag.com/2010/02/10-most-sexist-super-bowl-ads.html" rel="nofollow"> 10 Most Sexist Super Bowl Ads</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skeptifem</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/02/07/shameless-self-promotion-sunday-132/#comment-293426</link>
		<dc:creator>skeptifem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17451#comment-293426</guid>
		<description>My piece on zuska&#039;s mansplaingate &#039;10

http://skeptifem.blogspot.com/2010/01/shit-stirring-at-scienceblogs-part-2.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My piece on zuska&#8217;s mansplaingate &#8217;10</p>
<p><a href="http://skeptifem.blogspot.com/2010/01/shit-stirring-at-scienceblogs-part-2.html" rel="nofollow">http://skeptifem.blogspot.com/2010/01/shit-stirring-at-scienceblogs-part-2.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn Gazis-Sax</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/02/07/shameless-self-promotion-sunday-132/#comment-293425</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Gazis-Sax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17451#comment-293425</guid>
		<description>Short stories:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://aleksandreia.wordpress.com/2010/01/23/in-her-dreams/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;In Her Dreams&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://aleksandreia.wordpress.com/2010/01/27/pay-the-piper/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pay the Piper&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://aleksandreia.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/tell-me-a-story/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tell Me a Story&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://aleksandreia.wordpress.com/2010/02/03/snow-white/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Snow White&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://aleksandreia.wordpress.com/2010/02/04/blood-will-tell/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Blood Will Tell&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://aleksandreia.wordpress.com/2010/02/05/declutterers-inc/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Declutterers, Inc.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short stories:</p>
<p><a href="http://aleksandreia.wordpress.com/2010/01/23/in-her-dreams/" rel="nofollow">In Her Dreams</a></p>
<p><a href="http://aleksandreia.wordpress.com/2010/01/27/pay-the-piper/" rel="nofollow">Pay the Piper</a></p>
<p><a href="http://aleksandreia.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/tell-me-a-story/" rel="nofollow">Tell Me a Story</a></p>
<p><a href="http://aleksandreia.wordpress.com/2010/02/03/snow-white/" rel="nofollow">Snow White</a></p>
<p><a href="http://aleksandreia.wordpress.com/2010/02/04/blood-will-tell/" rel="nofollow">Blood Will Tell</a></p>
<p><a href="http://aleksandreia.wordpress.com/2010/02/05/declutterers-inc/" rel="nofollow">Declutterers, Inc.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig R.</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/02/07/shameless-self-promotion-sunday-132/#comment-293424</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17451#comment-293424</guid>
		<description>this week, after the case being filed more than 2 years ago, &lt;a href=&quot;http://bostonprogressive.blogspot.com/2010/02/tax-court-reverses-irs-on-sex.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; the US Tax Court reverses the IRS decision and allows the  cost of reassignment surgery to be counted towards the itemized medical deduction&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this week, after the case being filed more than 2 years ago, <a href="http://bostonprogressive.blogspot.com/2010/02/tax-court-reverses-irs-on-sex.html" rel="nofollow"> the US Tax Court reverses the IRS decision and allows the  cost of reassignment surgery to be counted towards the itemized medical deduction</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ladystachette</title>
		<link>http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/02/07/shameless-self-promotion-sunday-132/#comment-293422</link>
		<dc:creator>Ladystachette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feministe.us/blog/?p=17451#comment-293422</guid>
		<description>My blog Ladystachette is just starting out, so I wrote a couple of introductory posts.

Firstly, &lt;a href=&quot;http://ladystachette.blogspot.com/2010/01/note-on-language.html&quot; title=&quot;A Note On Language.&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;, where I discussed a prominent vegan blogger&#039;s refusal to cease using the word &#039;lame&#039;, and why this wasn&#039;t okay. 

And &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ladystachette.blogspot.com/2010/02/kyri-what-my-position-on.html&quot; title=&quot;Kyri-what? My Position On Newcomers, Trolls, And Those With A Different Opinion.&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;, where I gave an explanation of the term &#039;kyriachy&#039;, and discussed my position on newcomers and trolls in an attempt to construct a safe space.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My blog Ladystachette is just starting out, so I wrote a couple of introductory posts.</p>
<p>Firstly, <a href="http://ladystachette.blogspot.com/2010/01/note-on-language.html" title="A Note On Language." rel="nofollow">, where I discussed a prominent vegan blogger&#8217;s refusal to cease using the word &#8216;lame&#8217;, and why this wasn&#8217;t okay. </p>
<p>And </a><a href="http://ladystachette.blogspot.com/2010/02/kyri-what-my-position-on.html" title="Kyri-what? My Position On Newcomers, Trolls, And Those With A Different Opinion." rel="nofollow">, where I gave an explanation of the term &#8216;kyriachy&#8217;, and discussed my position on newcomers and trolls in an attempt to construct a safe space.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 16/21 queries in 0.031 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.feministe.us @ 2012-02-10 09:11:36 -->
