Author: has written 5271 posts for this blog.

Jill has been blogging for Feministe since 2005.
Return to: Homepage | Blog Index

35 Responses

  1. FashionablyEvil
    FashionablyEvil November 7, 2012 at 12:13 pm |

    Minnesota’s a win. They voted down an amendment that would have amended the state constitution to define marriage as solely between a man and a woman.

    So, they did vote no, but you wanted the answer to the question to be no if you support marriage equality.

    1. kb
      kb November 7, 2012 at 9:45 pm |

      also, Minnesota still has a law that says man and woman. Not that blocking the constitutional amendment isn’t a good thing, but. . . I still had to legally swear that I was part of a man/woman couple to get married there.

      1. April
        April November 8, 2012 at 12:11 pm |

        I’m really hoping this means we’ve opened the floodgates for actual marriage equality here. My god, I was on the edge of my seat all night… super happy at first with “no” having a solid lead, then as the margin decreased, feeling really hopeless… then waking up to “no” votes on both the marriage amendment AND the voter ID amendment! I was optimistic about the marriage vote, but much less so for voter ID. I could have just peed. I’m so proud of my state :)

  2. Odin
    Odin November 7, 2012 at 12:18 pm |

    Hey now, MN ‘s a win for social justice! We REJECTED our anti-gay and voter-suppression amendments. Legitimately too, without relying on the “blank = no vote”, and despite nailbitingly close polls on the marriage amendment and, a week ago, pretty universal expectation that the voter ID amendment would pass by a significant margin.

    Yes, Bachmann was re-elected by her constituants, but the rest of the state rejected the anti-gay amendment that was her legacy from her tenure in the state legislature.

    1. amblingalong
      amblingalong November 7, 2012 at 12:56 pm |

      I always have a hard time wrapping my head around the MN Congressional delegation, including both the chair of the CPC and Bachmann as it does.

    2. Fiona
      Fiona November 7, 2012 at 3:28 pm |

      Bachmann was gerrymandered to victory.

      1. zuzu
        zuzu November 7, 2012 at 6:46 pm | *

        And barely eked out a win, even so.

  3. A.Y. Siu
    A.Y. Siu November 7, 2012 at 12:52 pm |

    And boo to Minnesota, otherwise one of my favorite states in the nation, for voting down marriage equality. But hey, two out of four (and hopefully three out of four) ain’t bad.

    I honestly think this kind of confusing presentation of voting propositions was a huge factor in Proposition 8 passing in California. No way there are that many homophobic people in California. Yes means no, no means yes… dangerous!

  4. Nobody
    Nobody November 7, 2012 at 12:54 pm |

    As a native Californian (now living on the East coast) I was thrilled to see that CA residents are finally getting tired of their state being an ungovernable mess thanks to the sh*ttrain that Howard Jarvis set in motion 30-odd years ago.

    CA has been in slow motion collapse for over a decade and I was honestly starting to think that people would never get fed up enough to do anything about it.

  5. Kristen J.
    Kristen J. November 7, 2012 at 1:08 pm |

    Here we celebrated with cake and beer. Sadly, Sheriff Joe was re-elected. Boo.

    1. Ladeeda
      Ladeeda November 7, 2012 at 1:25 pm |

      But Sinema looks like she might pull it off!

      1. Kristen J.
        Kristen J. November 7, 2012 at 7:27 pm |

        My fingers are crossed.

  6. Faithless
    Faithless November 7, 2012 at 2:12 pm |

    sigh, sadly even with the taxes on it, that means the street price of weed will go up in surrounding states since there will be legal options across the border :(

    1. Anon21
      Anon21 November 7, 2012 at 3:38 pm |

      I don’t understand why you would expect the price to go up. Wouldn’t the price go down, to compete with the new source of supply?

  7. FYouMudFlaps
    FYouMudFlaps November 7, 2012 at 2:47 pm |

    Yeah, just echoing the others who said Minnesota voting NO was the desired outcome since the amendment was going to enshrine inequality in the state constitution.

  8. FYouMudFlaps
    FYouMudFlaps November 7, 2012 at 2:48 pm |

    My avatar thingy is so cute!

  9. de Pizan
    de Pizan November 7, 2012 at 3:02 pm |

    As I understand it, Oregon’s marijuana measure was more radical than the ones that passed. It said that anyone could grow plants without a license as long as you were over 21; there was no maximum cap on how much you could have in your possession; and companies could grow hemp for industrial purposes without regulation. There was also much much less spent on advertising the bill as in the two other states.

  10. GallingGalla
    GallingGalla November 7, 2012 at 5:03 pm |

    Unfortunately, the news about marijuana in WA and CO isn’t as good as it seems, as marijuana is still illegal at the federal level. No legitimate vendors of marijuana can realistically be expected to develop when they are threatened with Federal raids and arrests – as has been happening with medical marijuana, where the Feds are prosecuting desperately ill patients and their suppliers. So I think the victory is symbolic.

    1. Donna L
      Donna L November 7, 2012 at 5:12 pm |

      On the other hand, I guess people don’t have to be worried that they’re going to be arrested if they walk down the street smoking a joint.

      1. ColoradoSal
        ColoradoSal November 7, 2012 at 6:31 pm |

        Actually, here in Colorado possession will be legal, but not public use. So… even without the state vs. federal issues, this would be a problem. I’m very curious to see how things play out.

        1. Radfem
          Radfem November 8, 2012 at 10:02 am |

          I know with medical marijuana in California in many cities the cities/counties just use code enforcement and the court system to close dispensaries. That happened in my city.

  11. Raudya
    Raudya November 7, 2012 at 10:08 pm |

    Congrats for people in the U.S :D So happy. Even though there’s a lot of “even thoughs” that could be levied, but there are a lot more great news to be celebrated. 4 more years. Here’s hoping the progress that has been made in this election could become a standard for years to come.

    Btw, there’s an interesting video by the Guardian, interviewing people around the world’s reaction to Obama’s win : russians, egyptian, chinese… quite interesting. Interviews.

  12. Tony
    Tony November 7, 2012 at 10:52 pm |

    The result doesn’t change the damage that Citizens United does. It’s the giving, not the spending, that matters; by giving huge amounts to candidates, secret super-wealthy donors have what they want, which is influence over the candidate and the party. Yes, this time, an outpouring of small donor support for Barack Obama and an exceptionally better field and data operation on the Democratic side cancelled out the Republicans’ SuperPAC spending, but that won’t always be the case. Middle class and struggling families shouldn’t have to spend their money giving to political candidates just to keep the plyaing field even, and the Republicans will improve their ground game and political operations. Eventually, that money will be decisive.

    The bigger story to my mind is that- going into this cycle, the Republicans embraced the SuperPACs, but the Democrats were reluctant. Going forward, both sides will be embracing SuperPACs in an escalating arms race to court wealthy donors. Candidates on both sides will have less independence than before, the there is no end in sight to the continuing trend of more billions being poured into every single cycle. 2008 blew out 2004 in money spent, 2012 blew out 2008, and every indication is that 2016 will blow out 2012. The impact of the ruling will be felt in the long term.

  13. Raudya
    Raudya November 7, 2012 at 11:21 pm |

    Aah, bad news.

    From Wired; 4 more drones and a more comprehensive robotic warfare would be implemented soon. Not good at all.

    1. macavitykitsune
      macavitykitsune November 7, 2012 at 11:36 pm |

      Fucking of course.

      Because no matter who leads it, Rome 2.0 marches on.

    2. Raudya
      Raudya November 7, 2012 at 11:58 pm |

      @macavity, I wonder if it’s “valid” or not to talk about things like this. Because if romney had won, things would be much worse. Is it not ‘thankful’ to just accept things? Are those issues too soon to be adressed? But then I read some new reports about more deaths and bombings and conflicts and projects of war… those are important, and I think it’s still worthwhile to devote at least a little bit of the attention to those. /sorry for rant.

      1. macavitykitsune
        macavitykitsune November 8, 2012 at 12:28 am |

        Honestly, Raudya, I don’t know. Part of me feels vaguely guilty for being a party-pooper with my comment above, part of me is all “some parties need pooping” and the rest of me doesn’t think that the celebration is independent of the depression.

        1. SophiaBlue
          SophiaBlue November 8, 2012 at 2:06 am |

          Defeating Romney was work that needed to be done and is worthy of celebration, but I don’t think there’s any problem with reminding ourselves that the work is far from over.

        2. EG
          EG November 8, 2012 at 6:23 am |

          Agreed. Glad that Romney lost, but that doesn’t mean all is well.

  14. Raudya
    Raudya November 7, 2012 at 11:21 pm |

    Aah, bad news.

    From Wired; 4 more drones and a more comprehensive robotic warfare would be implemented soon. Not good at all.

  15. Stella
    Stella November 10, 2012 at 2:24 pm |

    Considering that Obama was an acting president and his opponent a mormon he did really badly.

  16. Larger Social Implications Of The 2012 Elections | My Sex Professor: Sexuality Education

    [...] Feministe also has a post-election round-up, and they point out that, among other things, Washington and Colorado have legalized selling and buying small batches of locally-grown marijuana. Driving under the influence will be treated similarly to existing DUI laws, which will help protect people who don’t wish to be users. Again, this has wider social implications: people are beginning to recognize that it’s a problem to be sending so many people to jail for a drug that is not that different from substances that are legal, such as alcohol, cigarettes, and prescription drugs. According to the Huffington Post: “Nationally, marijuana possession accounts for nearly half of all drug arrests, at well more than 500,000 a year.” Hopefully those numbers start to go down, at least in the states that have legalized possession. [...]

Comments are closed.

The commenting period has expired for this post. If you wish to re-open the discussion, please do so in the latest Open Thread.