Author: has written 266 posts for this blog.

Return to: Homepage | Blog Index

28 Responses

  1. FashionablyEvil
    FashionablyEvil February 7, 2013 at 2:31 pm |

    female breast nipples

    So, female nipples that are not on the breasts are okay? Got it.

    1. Andie
      Andie February 7, 2013 at 2:41 pm |

      Third nipples are fair game!

  2. james
    james February 7, 2013 at 2:45 pm |

    In CBS’s defense, I don’t think all these rules are really of their own invention. The FCC has very strict regulations about what cannot be shown on broadcast stations.

    CBS surely doesn’t want any ‘wardrobe malfunctions’. (They were the station which broadcast Superbowl 38, I believe.)

    If you want to criticize someone for silly regulations, target Washington bureaucrats.

    1. Past my expiration date
      Past my expiration date February 7, 2013 at 3:00 pm |

      If you want to criticize someone for silly regulations, target Washington bureaucrats.

      As a Washington bureaucrat myself (hi!), I would be astonished if a Washington bureaucrat were responsible for regulations including the phrase “bare fleshy under curves”. I’m also reasonably sure (though not absolutely certain) that the FCC does not care about brand names on T-shirts. So please explain to me again why I shouldn’t criticize CBS?

      1. james
        james February 7, 2013 at 3:20 pm |

        I have a feeling that the ‘feminist outrage’ about CBS’s standards have nothing to do with T-shirt logos and everything to do with CBS’s insistence on ‘modesty’ – particularly that female breasts are taboo but male breasts aren’t.

        And no, that isn’t a standard made up by CBS.

        I’m not saying the double standard is right or wrong… just that CBS doesn’t want women showing breasts because Viacom doesn’t want another $3.5M fine.

        Frankly, CBS probably wishes it could allow more suggestive outfits to bring in male Grammy viewers. Isn’t showing softcore female nudity a ratings staple for pretty much every show on HBO?

        1. Past my expiration date
          Past my expiration date February 7, 2013 at 3:40 pm |

          ‘feminist outrage’

          Um, what?

        2. Anon21
          Anon21 February 7, 2013 at 3:42 pm |

          I believe this is mere “feminist mockery,” emphasis on the mockery, of CBS’s ridiculous terminology.

  3. Past my expiration date
    Past my expiration date February 7, 2013 at 2:52 pm |

    Since I won’t be on camera at the Grammys anyway, I suppose it doesn’t matter, but: will somebody please explain “visible “puffy” bare skin exposure” to me?

    1. james
      james February 7, 2013 at 2:59 pm |

      Unless I’m missing something here, I’m taking that as PR speak for:
      “Beyonce, if you’re gonna wear your thong-crotched superbowl outfit again, make sure your labia stay inside.”

    2. Fat Steve
      Fat Steve February 7, 2013 at 4:16 pm |

      Since I won’t be on camera at the Grammys anyway, I suppose it doesn’t matter, but: will somebody please explain “visible “puffy” bare skin exposure” to me?

      two words…one being camel…

    3. Henry
      Henry February 8, 2013 at 1:46 am |

      They really should have just said camel toe. Get with the times CBS. Plus as a lawyer I long for the day when one of my ilk gets paid to write the words “camel toe”.

      I think all the male awardees should go in shirt and jacket-less tuxes a la Chippendales, man boob sporters included, to protest the nipple rule. Dammit our nips are nearly equal!

    4. pheenobarbidoll
      pheenobarbidoll February 8, 2013 at 11:58 am |

      Sounds more like pubic mound than camel toe. Camel toe is covered flesh, pubic mounds can be exposed if your pants are low enough. And men and women have that area.

      1. Ledasmom
        Ledasmom February 8, 2013 at 12:06 pm |

        I’m pretty sure it’s not the skin, as such, that is puffy, anyway.
        Also, they specify puffy bare skin exposure, so I assume that puffy hairy skin is just A-OK with them.
        That is to say, CBS seems a tad unclear as to the anatomy of genital regions. If they mean labia, they should say labia. It’s not as if they can claim prudery, having said “buttock crack”.

        1. pheenobarbidoll
          pheenobarbidoll February 8, 2013 at 12:15 pm |

          A pubic mound is the fatty area that protects the pubic bone, which is why it’s “puffy”. No hair is required for “puffiness” and I’m inclined to think they used puffy to avoid using fatty.

  4. A
    A February 7, 2013 at 3:19 pm |

    I love how “puffy” is in quotes… as if I’m supposed to understand this innuendo? I can’t really think of any part of my genitals that I would describe as “puffy”…

    1. james
      james February 7, 2013 at 3:23 pm |

      It is cold & flu season… maybe they’re just disgusted by puffy sinuses.
      “No showing sick celeb faces.” :)

    2. Kasey Weird
      Kasey Weird February 8, 2013 at 1:33 pm |

      My thoughts exactly. I think my bits are missing whatever part they were trying to refer to as “puffy”

    3. pheenobarbidoll
      pheenobarbidoll February 8, 2013 at 3:31 pm |

      Pubic mound. And I think “puffy” was their nicer attempt to say “fatty”.

  5. McMike
    McMike February 7, 2013 at 3:33 pm |

    They are not going to concern themselves with global warming or financial injustice? What a shocker !!

  6. Manon
    Manon February 7, 2013 at 4:45 pm |

    I read the comments on the news’ page, and I really shouldn’t have… Please, someone tell me that this isn’t representative of the USA’s population.

    1. Amelia the Lurker
      Amelia the Lurker February 8, 2013 at 1:47 am |

      Malheureusement…

  7. Joerg
    Joerg February 7, 2013 at 6:14 pm |

    “Foreign language will need to be cleared”

    What is foreign language? Things other than English? What about Spanish? What if you aren’t American, is your mother tongue “foreign”? What if Psy wants to print a bit of his lyrics, does he need to stick to the English part?

    1. Amelia the Lurker
      Amelia the Lurker February 8, 2013 at 1:46 am |

      I took that to mean that you could use languages that aren’t English, but that a third party would have to vet it first, which is stupid.

    2. Henry
      Henry February 8, 2013 at 1:49 am |

      They are looking for profanity, or product placements or political comments or really anything they could have charged someone to display or could get fined for displaying.

  8. John
    John February 8, 2013 at 7:13 am |

    I like it! CBS says if we don’t get our cut you don’t get to have names on your clothes! DORKS! Have the Breast Cancer, AIDS and all that out in front. Maybe that will help save someone instead of being a great big atta-boy event for some overpaid, underworked and total ego people who if they don’t get enough press throw hissy-fits so they get in the press and all of them could be replaced within minutes! And no I will not watch and matter of fact could care less about the entire thing. even if all of them went totally nude.

  9. John
    John February 8, 2013 at 11:06 am |

    I suppose the issue of men’s nips v women’s nips and why and how we got where we are is for another day. Janet Jackson’s pasty, etc..

    Used to be a time in the early 1900s when sea bathing first became popular and men wore swimsuits not too different from the one-piece cozzies women wear today. Men’s chests have become un-vulgar since then.
    Odd old world.

  10. EmbraceYourInnerCrone
    EmbraceYourInnerCrone February 8, 2013 at 11:13 am |

    Am I channelling my inner fiveyearold to wish that someone would wear an outfit like the ones worn in the past by Steisand or Cher(maybe Justin Timberlake could do it] I don t remember if those were the Grammies or Oscars. I just have a juvenile wish to see someone give them the virtual finger.

  11. Tyris
    Tyris February 9, 2013 at 11:58 am |

    We’ve got puffy skin all around the eyes… better cover ‘em up!

Comments are closed.

The commenting period has expired for this post. If you wish to re-open the discussion, please do so in the latest Open Thread.