This is a guest post by Diana Lind. Diana Lind lives in Philadelphia and is editor in chief of Next City.
On the bus to work last Monday morning, I read the print version of the New York Times; on my way home, I read Lean In on my Kindle for iPhone. The two messages, not to mention their media, never seemed so far apart.
As an editor of an online magazine, I anticipate reading the Times’ Business Day section on Mondays and its section-wide focus on media trends. And since David Carr is the paper’s main media columnist, I look forward to reading what he has to say. But like every other Monday I could remember, Carr’s column profiled yet another man.
In this particular case, he was writing about Steve Coll, the New Yorker writer who has just been named Dean of Columbia University’s School of Journalism. Carr’s piece didn’t just focus on another white male writer, it also relied solely on quotes from other white male writers (ie. John Schwartz of the New York Times and Michael Wolff of USA Today). Carr’s column was attempting to persuade readers that Coll is ready for the disruptions in the journalism field; given Carr’s own stodgy reliance on writing about the other guys in the field he already knows, Carr made that harder to believe.
Carr stayed true to form yesterday with a column celebrating the late Roger Ebert. Researching the column, it’s clear that Carr specializes in male reportage. Look at the last year of his blog posts and printed pieces and you’ll see a repetitive slew of the same kind of profiles: white media figures (Andrew Sullivan, Aaron Sorkin, Piers Morgan, David Bradley, Keith Olbermann, Andrew Breitbart) or of bright new male things (the guys behind Atavist, Byliner and South Park).
In 2013, he’s only devoted one such feature to a woman: Martha Stewart. Looking back into 2012, he wrote about a new editor at Cosmo, the media’s depictions of Michelle Obama and how the female publisher of the Washington Post might bring its downfall. It would be oversimplifying if it didn’t seem kind of true: he writes about women in the context of cooking, worrying about their looks, primping themselves for sex, or being inept. There isn’t a profile of someone like Sandberg among them.
We imagine Silicon Valley and Wall Street to be male-dominated worlds, but that’s only partly true. The media, and old heads like David Carr, are to be blamed for the way they cover boy geniuses and can’t seem to find an angle on women who are blazing new paths in the field. Where’s the Carr profile on Maria Rodale, CEO of Rodale, Inc? If looking for bright young things, how about looking at writing about Lily Liu’s empire PublicStuff? Why hasn’t he written about the National Magazine Awards and how they’ve corrected their boy bias this year?
If David Carr is going to remain the lead columnist for media trends at the Times, he can’t just report on “disruption,” he needs to be open to it himself. As I rode home reading Sheryl Sandberg, I couldn’t help but think that David Carr was just like one of the many clueless men she recounts who have no idea of their biases and the ways they overlook women. As Sandberg says, it’s up to women to correct those kind of guys. I hope David Carr is listening.
Similar Posts (automatically generated):
- Well, hello there. by Jaclyn July 19, 2010
- EWW! Is That Period Blood?! by frau sally benz August 7, 2009
- We Are Not Your Afterthought: responding to LGBT Soup by Guest Blogger April 2, 2013
- I’m so utterly shocked by Ashley June 30, 2008
- The Dot, The Line and the Gender Divide by SnowdropExplodes June 13, 2007