Testifying for your pimp

This piece in the Times about sex workers who testified on behalf of their pimps in a sex trafficking case is… interesting. It touches on too many complex issues for me to do it justice in a blog post without having read the trial transcript or knowing much of the background, but a few thoughts:

-Vincent George Sr. and Vincent George Jr. sound like abusive, manipulative, awful people.

-“Sex trafficking” has perhaps been defined so broadly that it’s starting to lose meaning. There needs to be a way to prosecute abusive treatment of sex workers without simply expanding the sex trafficking framework to include every form of sex work.

-Yes, women have agency. But women in abusive relationships often defend their abusers, either refusing to testify against them or even supporting them. I dislike the framing of the women’s testimony on behalf of the Georges “may actually be evidence of how effective the pimps were in manipulating the women,” because the essential take-away there is that there’s no way for the women to not be manipulated; whatever they say is good for the prosecution. At the same time, it is a reality that emotional and psychological manipulation in abusive relationships exists and should be addressed.

-I’m not sure the legal system has the tools to holistically deal with the complex issues presented in cases like this one. We can’t jam every real story into the victim / victimizer framework.

About Jill

Jill began blogging for Feministe in 2005. She has since written as a weekly columnist for the Guardian newspaper and in April 2014 she was appointed as senior political writer for Cosmopolitan magazine.
This entry was posted in Domestic Violence, Sex. Bookmark the permalink.