The march backwards

Guest Blogger Bio: Thilde Knudsen is the Head of Marie Stopes International’s Europe Office and works with the European Parliament Working Group on Reproductive Health, HIV/AIDS and Development.

Women’s sexual and reproductive rights at risk

Spain is about to criminalise abortion; politicians in the UK repeatedly attempt to reduce the 24-week limit and today (Apr 10) in Brussels, a Parliamentary hearing is discussing a European Citizens’ initiative that if successful would block European Commission (EC) development funding for maternal health.

Working for sexual and reproductive health charity, Marie Stopes International, I know that every day, 800 women die during pregnancy or childbirth, and 99% of these women are from the developing world. This is why the international community identified maternal health as one of the eight Millennium Development Goals and why the European Union (EU) apportions development funding to maternal health each year.

But the ‘One of Us’ initiative, which aims to block EC funding for any activities that involve the destruction of the human embryo, would adversely affect development aid to maternal health projects. Projects that enable women in developing countries to make life-saving choices over their fertility; projects that help young women delay pregnancy until they are physically developed to safely deliver and projects that give mothers time to recover before giving birth to their next child.

Data proves that the initiative is sadly misguided . Restricting safe abortions through similar interventions like the global gag policy in America, does not lead to lower abortion rates, it just pushes it underground. The only proven way to reduce the number of abortions is through access to modern contraception and sexuality education, both of which could be adversely affected by the One of Us initiative.

Today, it is estimated that roughly half of all women living in developing countries do not have access to adequate basic maternal health care and that 220 million have an unmet need for family planning. The consequences of this include almost 300,000 preventable maternal deaths every year, millions of women affected by debilitating injury such as obstetric fistula and the perpetuation of poverty and disempowerment as women are unable to delay childbearing or to choose their family size. This is why continued EU support for maternal health and family planning is essential.

The EC currently spends an estimated €121.5 million euros per year  on maternal health and family planning – equivalent to approximately 1.3% of the funding gap to meet the unmet need for maternal health and family planning .

Thankfully, ‘One of Us’ is unlikely to achieve its aims. The initiative which celebrated its 1.8 million signatures with much fanfare is in reality just over a quarter of one percent of the population of Europe. Critics have also pointed out that the way European Citizen initiatives are structured give an advantage to large organisations, like the Catholic Church, to mobilise their supporters.

However, this is not a green light for complacency. On the contrary, it should be a warning to everyone who believes in women’s rights that we have been silent too long. In Europe, women are often deemed to have achieved equal rights. Since the 60s when women’s liberation movements stood up and called for sweeping changes to access to equal pay, divorce and abortion, the passionate demonstrations, speeches and rallies have gradually gone quiet and today many young women would never dream of calling themselves a feminist.

Yet, our complacency is proving to be very dangerous, as the hard-won rights our mothers fought for are slowly being chipped away. Who would have predicted that Spain would be bringing in a draconian bill to end women’s rights to safe abortion, making it one of the most restrictive countries in Europe. If Spanish prime minister, Mariano Rajoy has his way, abortion will be illegal except in the case of rape or when there’s a risk to the physical and mental health of the mother and women could soon be resorting to the same dangerous methods they relied on decades ago: seeking out backstreet abortions or attempting to end the pregnancy themselves.

While just outside Europe’s borders, in Turkey, where abortion was legalised in 1983 because of the high numbers of deaths by backstreet abortions, a new law just passed will make it impossible for women in the country to gain access to legal abortions, health professionals and human rights activists have warned.

While movements like One of Us are attempting to erode women’s rights and mislead European citizens about the importance and value of our development assistance and maternal healthcare, we need to make our voices heard and Make Women Matter.

There is an urgent need for the global community to work together in meeting the funding gap in full in order to save and transform the lives of millions who live in poverty. Europe must stand for access to the whole range of sexual and reproductive services – including access to safe abortion when needed – here at home in Europe, and in partnership with other governments around the world.

Similar Posts (automatically generated):

About Guest Blogger

Guest Bloggers are most welcome to diversify the range of views and experiences presented on this blog. The opinions of Guest Bloggers do not necessarily represent other bloggers on Feministe: differing voices are important to us. Readers are cordially invited to follow our guidelines to submit a Guest Post pitch for consideration.
This entry was posted in Guest Blogging, Law, Reproductive Rights and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to The march backwards

  1. EG says:

    Thanks for this post. Living in the US, it’s easy for me to idealize Europe’s health-care systems and envy what seems like the comparative lack of influence right-wing Christians have. Thanks for filling in more details to that picture.

    Question: to what extent, do you think, might the “One of Us” initiative be influenced by racism toward women in the developing world–either by considering their deaths and suffering as acceptable losses, or “part of their culture” or what have you?

    • Dibbit says:

      Question: to what extent, do you think, might the “One of Us” initiative be influenced by racism toward women in the developing world–either by considering their deaths and suffering as acceptable losses, or “part of their culture” or what have you?

      Although I’m not too familiar with the “One of Us” people, I do know some of the fringe groups that are vehemently pro-life.
      For them, I can say: They’re not really out to RESTRICT abortions out of racism.
      In fact, the way their world-view is, they feel like the developing world is “out-breeding them” and there should be forced birth control for anyone with the wrong skin colour or from “a weird country”

      Their ideal would be:

      – Nice white girls are pregnant all the time and have huge families to keep our culture and way of life intact.

      – Everybody else is already overpopulating with the being pregnant all the time, they need to be stopped or they’ll overrun us! Argh! Argh! Argh!

      – Also, close the borders! They’re here to steal our land / money / nice white girls!

  2. FYouMudFlaps says:

    Very disappointing with Spain, being otherwise one of the most socially advanced countries.

  3. Marcie says:

    Marie Stopes?
    Rings a bell:

    Maybe they should remane their organisation?

    • Echo Zen says:

      Maybe they should rename the Ford Motor Company, since Ford was a notorious anti-Semite. At any rate, most women at risk of death from childbirth would care more about dying than they would about a health agency’s external branding.

      • PrettyAmiable says:

        That’s not fair – Marcie didn’t say the non-profit was doing bad work. I think it’s fair to side-eye an organization that is designed to save women’s lives when it’s named after a woman who didn’t support ALL women’s lives. Marie Stopes wrote a letter to Hitler asking him to disseminate her anti-Semitic literature in Germany. That doesn’t earn a side-eye?

      • Donna L says:

        From Wikipedia (footnotes omitted):

        In 1935 Stopes attended the International Congress for Population Science in Berlin, held in the second year of Hitler’s rule. She was more than once accused of being anti-Semitic by other pioneers of the birth control movement such as Havelock Ellis. She was also anti-Prussian, anti-Catholic and anti-Russian, if one can judge by the following unpublished piece of verse, written in 1942, at the height of the struggle with the Axis powers.

        Catholics, Prussians,
        The Jews and the Russians,
        All are a curse,
        Or something worse…

        Stopes, who was ever ready to promote her writings, sent a copy of her Love Songs for Young Lovers to Adolf Hitler with the following cover letter:

        Dear Herr Hitler,

        Love is the greatest thing in the world: so will you accept from me these (poems) that you may allow the young people of your nation to have them?

        The young must learn love from the particular ’till they are wise enough for the universal.

        I hope too that you yourself may find something to enjoy in the book.

        (letter from Marie Stopes to Hitler, August 1939)

      • Echo Zen says:

        Well, okay, when you take the time to put it that way, that sounds more justifiable.

    • Donna L says:

      Plus she was apparently very strongly against abortion.

      I’m sure 999 out of 1000 people to whom the organization provides assistance have never heard of Marie Stopes (just as I never had heard of her), so I would wonder why they wouldn’t consider changing the name.

  4. Pingback: The March Backwards | thefeministblogproject

  5. McMike says:

    Whether its progress or regress depends on your point of view.

Comments are closed.